volume 23 issue 1 pages 3-17

Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review

Ashok Vegesna 1, 2
Melody Tran 2, 3
Michele Angelaccio 2
Steve Arcona 2
1
 
Jefferson College of Population Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
2
 
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
3
 
Scott & White Health Plan, Temple, Texas.
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2016-04-26
scimago Q1
wos Q3
SJR0.999
CiteScore6.5
Impact factor2.0
ISSN15305627, 15563669
General Medicine
Health Informatics
Health Information Management
Abstract
We conducted a systematic literature review to identify key trends associated with remote patient monitoring (RPM) via noninvasive digital technologies over the last decade.A search was conducted in EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE. Citations were screened for relevance against predefined selection criteria based on the PICOTS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Timeframe, and Study Design) format. We included studies published between January 1, 2005 and September 15, 2015 that used RPM via noninvasive digital technology (smartphones/personal digital assistants [PDAs], wearables, biosensors, computerized systems, or multiple components of the formerly mentioned) in evaluating health outcomes compared to standard of care or another technology. Studies were quality appraised according to Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.Of 347 articles identified, 62 met the selection criteria. Most studies were randomized control trials with older adult populations, small sample sizes, and limited follow-up. There was a trend toward multicomponent interventions (n = 26), followed by smartphones/PDAs (n = 12), wearables (n = 11), biosensor devices (n = 7), and computerized systems (n = 6). Another key trend was the monitoring of chronic conditions, including respiratory (23%), weight management (17%), metabolic (18%), and cardiovascular diseases (16%). Although substantial diversity in health-related outcomes was noted, studies predominantly reported positive findings.This review will help decision makers develop a better understanding of the current landscape of peer-reviewed literature, demonstrating the utility of noninvasive RPM in various patient populations. Future research is needed to determine the effectiveness of RPM via noninvasive digital technologies in delivering patient healthcare benefits and the feasibility of large-scale implementation.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
18 publications, 5.61%
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
13 publications, 4.05%
Sensors
12 publications, 3.74%
Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
11 publications, 3.43%
BMC Health Services Research
7 publications, 2.18%
npj Digital Medicine
6 publications, 1.87%
Digital Health
5 publications, 1.56%
BMJ Open
5 publications, 1.56%
JMIR Perioperative Medicine
4 publications, 1.25%
JMIR Research Protocols
3 publications, 0.93%
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
3 publications, 0.93%
Epilepsy and Behavior
3 publications, 0.93%
Applied Clinical Informatics
3 publications, 0.93%
IEEE Access
3 publications, 0.93%
JMIR Aging
2 publications, 0.62%
Health Informatics Journal
2 publications, 0.62%
Sustainability
2 publications, 0.62%
Journal of Clinical Medicine
2 publications, 0.62%
Frontiers in Digital Health
2 publications, 0.62%
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
2 publications, 0.62%
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
2 publications, 0.62%
Journal of Medical Systems
2 publications, 0.62%
Critical Care Clinics
2 publications, 0.62%
PLoS ONE
2 publications, 0.62%
The Lancet Digital Health
2 publications, 0.62%
International Journal of Medical Informatics
2 publications, 0.62%
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
2 publications, 0.62%
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
2 publications, 0.62%
Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
2 publications, 0.62%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
JMIR Publications
69 publications, 21.5%
Springer Nature
52 publications, 16.2%
Elsevier
45 publications, 14.02%
MDPI
25 publications, 7.79%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
17 publications, 5.3%
Mary Ann Liebert
12 publications, 3.74%
SAGE
12 publications, 3.74%
Wiley
10 publications, 3.12%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
9 publications, 2.8%
Frontiers Media S.A.
7 publications, 2.18%
BMJ
6 publications, 1.87%
Taylor & Francis
5 publications, 1.56%
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
5 publications, 1.56%
Oxford University Press
5 publications, 1.56%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
5 publications, 1.56%
IGI Global
5 publications, 1.56%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 0.62%
ifmbe proceedings
2 publications, 0.62%
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
1 publication, 0.31%
Emerald
1 publication, 0.31%
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
1 publication, 0.31%
S. Karger AG
1 publication, 0.31%
American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
1 publication, 0.31%
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
1 publication, 0.31%
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine
1 publication, 0.31%
Scientific Research Publishing
1 publication, 0.31%
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
1 publication, 0.31%
Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors
1 publication, 0.31%
Eco-Vector LLC
1 publication, 0.31%
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
321
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Vegesna A. et al. Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review // Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 2016. Vol. 23. No. 1. pp. 3-17.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Vegesna A., Tran M., Angelaccio M., Arcona S. Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review // Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. 2016. Vol. 23. No. 1. pp. 3-17.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1089/tmj.2016.0051
UR - https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0051
TI - Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review
T2 - Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
AU - Vegesna, Ashok
AU - Tran, Melody
AU - Angelaccio, Michele
AU - Arcona, Steve
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/04/26
PB - Mary Ann Liebert
SP - 3-17
IS - 1
VL - 23
PMID - 27116181
SN - 1530-5627
SN - 1556-3669
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2016_Vegesna,
author = {Ashok Vegesna and Melody Tran and Michele Angelaccio and Steve Arcona},
title = {Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review},
journal = {Telemedicine Journal and e-Health},
year = {2016},
volume = {23},
publisher = {Mary Ann Liebert},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0051},
number = {1},
pages = {3--17},
doi = {10.1089/tmj.2016.0051}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Vegesna, Ashok, et al. “Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review.” Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, vol. 23, no. 1, Apr. 2016, pp. 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2016.0051.