2877 Can we make comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) person-centred? A quality improvement project using the CGA-questionnaire
Introduction
CGA is the gold-standard intervention for older adults living with frailty. A challenge is providing person-centred, time-efficient CGA. The CGA-questionnaire (CGA-Q) aims to facilitate person-centred CGA, allowing patients/carers to highlight concerns. We describe a two-site multi-cycle QIP implementing the CGA-Q.
Methods
CGA-Q is a 19-item questionnaire covering seven CGA domains. It was adapted from the validated CGA-GOLD questionnaire. Between March 2023–June 2024, CGA-Q was established in a London and Scottish NHS Trust using ‘Plan-Do-Study-Act’ methodology. Cycle 1–3 involved designing and establishing CGA-Q at one London geriatric clinic. Cycle 4 assessed feasibility in multiple London geriatric clinics. Cycle 5 examined implementation of CGA-Q in a Scottish day-hospital. Person-centredness refers to inclusion of person-selected concerns in clinic letters, and not including person-excluded concerns.
Results
Across cycles, cohorts were comparable in age, sex, frailty and cognitive status. In cycles 1–3 (n = 174), CGA-Q completion rates improved from 39% to 83%. More CGA-Q questions were addressed especially cognition, mood, continence and falls. Inclusion of person-selected concerns increased from 60% to 70%; exclusion of person-excluded concerns remained ~70%. In cycle 4, completion rates varied by clinic: renal-CGA 100% (12/12); CGA 42% (13/31); bone-health 14% (10/60). >50% of questionnaires were completed by patients, except in bone-health where two-thirds were completed by staff. Staff feedback highlights CGA-Q is a useful discussion prompt. In cycle 5 (n = 41), a similar breadth of CGA-Q questions was addressed among respondents compared to baseline. With CGA-Q, continence and pain were addressed more frequently. Inclusion of person-selected concerns was 62%; exclusion of person-excluded concerns was 71%.
Conclusion
CGA-Q has been successfully implemented across multiple sites and clinics. It can improve person-centeredness and breadth of CGA, but early results vary across subspecialty geriatric medicine clinics with their unique processes. Ongoing work will determine the experience of patients and carers of this approach.