Open Access
Open access
Clean Energy

Comparative analysis of the prediction accuracy of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure peak based on three kinds of theoretical models

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-28
Journal: Clean Energy
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.559
CiteScore4.0
Impact factor2.9
ISSN25154230, 2515396X
Abstract

Hydrogen energy is pivotal in the energy transition due to its high efficiency and zero-emission characteristics. However, the potential for explosions constrains its broader application. Gaining insights into the dynamics of overpressure in hydrogen explosions is vital for the safe design of explosion-proof facilities and the determination of equipment spacing. This study investigates hydrogen explosions in open spaces of 1 m³ and 27 m³ volumes, analyzing flame propagation and overpressure distribution. It also evaluates the accuracy of three theoretical models in predicting peak overpressure. The results reveal that the spherical flame from a hydrogen cloud explosion transforms into an ellipsoidal shape upon contact with the ground. The average flame propagation velocity across different equivalent ratio is ordered as follows: Va (φ = 1.0) > Va (φ = 1.5) > Va (φ = 2.5) > Va (φ = 0.5). At equivalent distances, the peak overpressure of hydrogen cloud explosions is comparable across both scales. The traditional trinitrotoluene model overestimates the peak overpressure of hydrogen cloud explosions at both scales. The optimized trinitrotoluene model achieves over 90% accuracy in predicting hydrogen cloud explosions in 1m³ volumes but shows decreased accuracy in 27 m³ explosions. At source intensity level 3, the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek multi-energy model exhibits a prediction accuracy of over 70% for peak overpressure in hydrogen cloud explosions, with consistent performance across different scales, rendering it a more reliable model for such predictions. This research enhances hydrogen safety assessment technologies by providing a more precise method for evaluating large-scale hydrogen cloud explosion risks.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Peng B. et al. Comparative analysis of the prediction accuracy of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure peak based on three kinds of theoretical models // Clean Energy. 2025.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Peng B., Wang Q., Gao W., Xiao H., Luo Z., Bi M., Liu Y., Zhu H., Liu J. Comparative analysis of the prediction accuracy of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure peak based on three kinds of theoretical models // Clean Energy. 2025.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1093/ce/zkaf004
UR - https://academic.oup.com/ce/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ce/zkaf004/7985383
TI - Comparative analysis of the prediction accuracy of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure peak based on three kinds of theoretical models
T2 - Clean Energy
AU - Peng, Bin
AU - Wang, Qiuhong
AU - Gao, Wei
AU - Xiao, Huahua
AU - Luo, Zhenmin
AU - Bi, Mingshu
AU - Liu, Yifei
AU - Zhu, He
AU - Liu, Jianxiong
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/01/28
PB - Oxford University Press
SN - 2515-4230
SN - 2515-396X
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Peng,
author = {Bin Peng and Qiuhong Wang and Wei Gao and Huahua Xiao and Zhenmin Luo and Mingshu Bi and Yifei Liu and He Zhu and Jianxiong Liu},
title = {Comparative analysis of the prediction accuracy of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure peak based on three kinds of theoretical models},
journal = {Clean Energy},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = {jan},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/ce/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ce/zkaf004/7985383},
doi = {10.1093/ce/zkaf004}
}
Found error?