Electrical storm treatment by percutaneous stellate ganglion block: the STAR study
Background and Aims
An electrical storm (ES) is a clinical emergency with a paucity of established treatment options. Despite initial encouraging reports about the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB), many questions remained unsettled and evidence from a prospective multicentre study was still lacking. For these purposes, the STAR study was designed.
Methods
This is a multicentre observational study enrolling patients suffering from an ES refractory to standard treatment from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2023. The primary outcome was the reduction of treated arrhythmic events by at least 50% comparing the 12 h following PSGB with the 12 h before the procedure. STAR operators were specifically trained to both the anterior anatomical and the lateral ultrasound-guided approach.
Results
A total of 131 patients from 19 centres were enrolled and underwent 184 PSGBs. Patients were mainly male (83.2%) with a median age of 68 (63.8–69.2) years and a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (25.0 ± 12.3%). The primary outcome was reached in 92% of patients, and the median reduction of arrhythmic episodes between 12 h before and after PSGB was 100% (interquartile range −100% to −92.3%). Arrhythmic episodes requiring treatment were significantly reduced comparing 12 h before the first PSGB with 12 h after the last procedure [six (3–15.8) vs. 0 (0–1), P < .0001] and comparing 1 h before with 1 h after each procedure [2 (0–6) vs. 0 (0–0), P < .001]. One major complication occurred (0.5%).
Conclusions
The findings of this large, prospective, multicentre study provide evidence in favour of the effectiveness and safety of PSGB for the treatment of refractory ES.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
|
European Heart Journal
5 publications, 8.93%
|
|
|
Europace
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
A&A practice
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
Resuscitation
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
Heart Rhythm
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
2 publications, 3.57%
|
|
|
Biology
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Current Cardiology Reports
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
IHJ Cardiovascular Reports
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Heliyon
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Bioelectronic Medicine
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Cureus
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Radiology
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
European Heart Journal, Supplement
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
ESC heart failure
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Journal of Physiology
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Anesthesiology Clinics
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
HeartRhythm Case Reports
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
JACC Case Reports
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
|
Elsevier
16 publications, 28.57%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
10 publications, 17.86%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
9 publications, 16.07%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
5 publications, 8.93%
|
|
|
MDPI
4 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Wiley
4 publications, 7.14%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
BMJ
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
American Physiological Society
1 publication, 1.79%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.