volume 26 issue 4

Continuous stellate ganglion block for ventricular arrhythmias: case series, systematic review, and differences from thoracic epidural anaesthesia

Veronica Dusi 1, 2
Filippo Angelini 2
Enrico Baldi 3
Antonio Toscano 4
Carol Gravinese 2
Simone Frea 2
Sara Compagnoni 5
Arianna Morena 1, 2
Andrea Saglietto 2
Eleonora Balzani 6
Matteo Giunta 4
Andrea Costamagna 4
Mauro Rinaldi 6, 7
Anna Chiara Trompeo 4
Matteo Anselmino 1, 2
Simone Savastano 3
G M De Ferrari 1, 2
2
 
Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, ‘Città della Salute e della Scienza’ Hospital , Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126 Torino , Italy
4
 
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, ‘Città della Salute e della Scienza’ Hospital , Torino , Italy
7
 
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, ‘Città della Salute e della Scienza’ Hospital , Torino , Italy
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-03-26
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR3.057
CiteScore12.6
Impact factor7.4
ISSN10995129, 15322092
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Physiology (medical)
Abstract
Background

Percutaneous stellate ganglion block (PSGB) through single bolus injection and thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) have been proposed for the acute management of refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). However, data on continuous PSGB (C-PSGB) are scant.

Aims

To report our dual-center experience with C-PSGB and to perform a systematic review on C-PSGB and TEA.

Methods

Consecutive patients receiving C-PSGB at 2 centers were enrolled. The systematic literature review follows the latest PRISMA criteria.

Results

Our case series (26 patients, 88% male, 60±16 years, all with advanced structural heart disease, LVEF 23±11%, 32 C-PSGB performed, median duration 3 days) shows that C-PSGB is feasible and safe and leads to complete VAs suppression in 59% and to overall clinical benefit in 94% of cases. Overall, 61 patients received 68 C-PSGB and 22 TEA, with complete VAs suppression in 63% of C-PSGBs (61% of patients). Most TEA procedures (55%) were performed on intubated patients, as opposed to 28% C-PSGBs (p=0.02); 52% of patients were on full anticoagulation at C-PSGB, none at TEA (p<0.001). Ropivacaine and lidocaine were the most used drugs for C-PSGB, and the available data support a starting dose of 12 mg/h and 100 mg/h, respectively. No major complications occurred, yet TEA discontinuation rate due to side-effects was higher than C-PSGB (18% versus 1%, p=0.01).

Conclusions

C-PSGB seems feasible, safe, and effective for the acute management of refractory VAs. The antiarrhythmic effect may be accomplished with less concerns for concomitant anticoagulation compared to TEA, and with a lower side-effects related discontinuation rate.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
2 publications, 14.29%
Current Cardiology Reports
1 publication, 7.14%
Heliyon
1 publication, 7.14%
Bioelectronic Medicine
1 publication, 7.14%
Heart Rhythm
1 publication, 7.14%
European Heart Journal, Supplement
1 publication, 7.14%
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
1 publication, 7.14%
Circulation Research
1 publication, 7.14%
Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine
1 publication, 7.14%
HeartRhythm Case Reports
1 publication, 7.14%
Journal of Emergency Medicine
1 publication, 7.14%
British Journal of Anaesthesia
1 publication, 7.14%
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
1 publication, 7.14%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Elsevier
7 publications, 50%
Springer Nature
2 publications, 14.29%
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 14.29%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 14.29%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 7.14%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
14
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Dusi V. et al. Continuous stellate ganglion block for ventricular arrhythmias: case series, systematic review, and differences from thoracic epidural anaesthesia // Europace. 2024. Vol. 26. No. 4.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Dusi V., Angelini F., Baldi E., Toscano A., Gravinese C., Frea S., Compagnoni S., Morena A., Saglietto A., Balzani E., Giunta M., Costamagna A., Rinaldi M., Trompeo A. C., Rordorf R., Anselmino M., Savastano S., De Ferrari G. M. Continuous stellate ganglion block for ventricular arrhythmias: case series, systematic review, and differences from thoracic epidural anaesthesia // Europace. 2024. Vol. 26. No. 4.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1093/europace/euae074
UR - https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae074
TI - Continuous stellate ganglion block for ventricular arrhythmias: case series, systematic review, and differences from thoracic epidural anaesthesia
T2 - Europace
AU - Dusi, Veronica
AU - Angelini, Filippo
AU - Baldi, Enrico
AU - Toscano, Antonio
AU - Gravinese, Carol
AU - Frea, Simone
AU - Compagnoni, Sara
AU - Morena, Arianna
AU - Saglietto, Andrea
AU - Balzani, Eleonora
AU - Giunta, Matteo
AU - Costamagna, Andrea
AU - Rinaldi, Mauro
AU - Trompeo, Anna Chiara
AU - Rordorf, Roberto
AU - Anselmino, Matteo
AU - Savastano, Simone
AU - De Ferrari, G M
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/03/26
PB - Oxford University Press
IS - 4
VL - 26
PMID - 38531027
SN - 1099-5129
SN - 1532-2092
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Dusi,
author = {Veronica Dusi and Filippo Angelini and Enrico Baldi and Antonio Toscano and Carol Gravinese and Simone Frea and Sara Compagnoni and Arianna Morena and Andrea Saglietto and Eleonora Balzani and Matteo Giunta and Andrea Costamagna and Mauro Rinaldi and Anna Chiara Trompeo and Roberto Rordorf and Matteo Anselmino and Simone Savastano and G M De Ferrari},
title = {Continuous stellate ganglion block for ventricular arrhythmias: case series, systematic review, and differences from thoracic epidural anaesthesia},
journal = {Europace},
year = {2024},
volume = {26},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae074},
number = {4},
doi = {10.1093/europace/euae074}
}
Profiles