volume 49 issue 3 pages 180-190

Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology

Luke N Rodda 1, 2, 3, 4
Kylie E. Candela 5, 6
Amy P Hart 3, 7
Ellen G Moffatt 1, 8
Ellen Moffatt 3, 7
Megan Farley 1, 3
Sue Pearring 1, 3
Karen S. Scott 6, 9
1
 
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner , San Francisco, California,
3
 
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner , 1 Newhall Street, San Francisco, CA 94124,
4
 
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California , 185 Berry Street, San Francisco, CA 94143,
7
 
Department of Pathology, University of California , 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143,
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-13
scimago Q1
wos Q3
SJR0.827
CiteScore5.8
Impact factor2.6
ISSN01464760, 19452403
Abstract

In postmortem forensic investigation cases where the bladder is voided or dehydrated prior to autopsy, it is possible to wash the bladder with saline and collect the ‘bladder wash’ and any residual urine for toxicological analysis. While not conventional, this study aims to determine the use of bladder washes as alternative specimens in postmortem forensic toxicology. Comprehensive drug and alcohol analysis was performed on blood, urine, vitreous humor and bladder wash samples. Control studies consisted of matched bladder wash and urine samples for comparison. Authentic applicability studies were performed on bladder wash samples in cases where only blood or no urine samples were available. Bladder wash testing via the routine urine methodology were shown to have the appropriate sensitivity and specificity to serve as an alternative specimen. Specificity of the applicability studies was further improved when comparisons were corrected by evaluating individual analytes jointly with their related parent drug or metabolites. Individual and corrected sensitivity and specificity rates of above 99% were typically observed in both comparisons against urine and blood paired samples. Following drug analysis of 31 cases in which only a bladder wash was available, 57 detections from 23 different analytes were detected that otherwise would have not been obtained. This study demonstrates that standardized collection of the easily accessible bladder wash for postmortem toxicological analysis serves forensic toxicologists and pathologists with invaluable information where urine or other biological specimens are not available.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Drug Testing and Analysis
1 publication, 25%
Toxics
1 publication, 25%
Journal of Analytical Toxicology
1 publication, 25%
Forensic Science International
1 publication, 25%
1

Publishers

1
Wiley
1 publication, 25%
MDPI
1 publication, 25%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 25%
Elsevier
1 publication, 25%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Rodda L. N. et al. Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology // Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2025. Vol. 49. No. 3. pp. 180-190.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Rodda L. N., Candela K. E., Hart A. P., Moffatt E. G., Moffatt E., Farley M., Pearring S., Scott K. S. Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology // Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2025. Vol. 49. No. 3. pp. 180-190.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1093/jat/bkaf001
UR - https://academic.oup.com/jat/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jat/bkaf001/7952950
TI - Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology
T2 - Journal of Analytical Toxicology
AU - Rodda, Luke N
AU - Candela, Kylie E.
AU - Hart, Amy P
AU - Moffatt, Ellen G
AU - Moffatt, Ellen
AU - Farley, Megan
AU - Pearring, Sue
AU - Scott, Karen S.
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/01/13
PB - Oxford University Press
SP - 180-190
IS - 3
VL - 49
SN - 0146-4760
SN - 1945-2403
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Rodda,
author = {Luke N Rodda and Kylie E. Candela and Amy P Hart and Ellen G Moffatt and Ellen Moffatt and Megan Farley and Sue Pearring and Karen S. Scott},
title = {Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology},
journal = {Journal of Analytical Toxicology},
year = {2025},
volume = {49},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = {jan},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/jat/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jat/bkaf001/7952950},
number = {3},
pages = {180--190},
doi = {10.1093/jat/bkaf001}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Rodda, Luke N., et al. “Bladder Wash: A Proof of Concept as an Alternative Specimen for Postmortem Toxicology.” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, vol. 49, no. 3, Jan. 2025, pp. 180-190. https://academic.oup.com/jat/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jat/bkaf001/7952950.