Open Access
Open access
Journal of Radiation Research, volume 65, issue 6, pages 851-861

Current status of the working environment of brachytherapy in Japan: a nationwide survey-based analysis focusing on radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists

Toru Kojima 1
Hiroyuki Okamoto 2
Masahiko Kurooka 3
Naoki Tohyama 4
Ichiro Tsuruoka 5
Mikio Nemoto 6
Kohei Shimomura 7, 8
Atsushi Myojoyama 9, 10
Hitoshi Ikushima 11
Tatsuya Ohno 12
Hiroshi Ohnishi 13
Show full list: 11 authors
2
 
Division of Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance, National Cancer Center Hospital , 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045 ,
7
 
Department of Radiological Technology , Faculty of Medical Science, , 1-3 Sonobe-cho oyamahigashi-machi, Nantan-shi, Kyoto 622-0041 ,
8
 
Kyoto College of Medical Science , Faculty of Medical Science, , 1-3 Sonobe-cho oyamahigashi-machi, Nantan-shi, Kyoto 622-0041 ,
9
 
Department of Radiological Science , Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, , 7-2-10 Higashiogu, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo 116-8551 ,
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-10-24
scimago Q2
SJR0.546
CiteScore3.6
Impact factor1.9
ISSN04493060, 13499157
PubMed ID:  39446317
Abstract

Brachytherapy (BT), especially in high dose rate (HDR), has become increasingly complex owing to the use of image-guided techniques and the introduction of advanced applicators. Consequently, radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists (RTMPs) require substantial training to enhance their knowledge and technical skills in image-guided brachytherapy. However, the current status of the RTMP workload, individual abilities and quality control (QC) of BT units in Japan remains unclear. To address this issue, we conducted a questionnaire survey from June to August 2022 in all 837 radiation treatment facilities in Japan involving RTMPs. This survey focused on gynecological cancers treated with HDR-BT (GY-HDR) and permanent prostate implantation using low-dose-rate BT (PR-LDR). The responses revealed that the average working time in the overall process for HDR varied: 120 min for intracavitary BT and 180 min for intracavitary BT combined with interstitial BT. The QC implementation rate, in accordance with domestic guidelines, was 65% for GY-HDR and 44% for PR-LDR, which was lower than the 69% observed for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Additionally, the implementation rate during regular working hours was low. Even among RTMP working in facilities performing BT, the proportion of those able to perform QC for BT units was ~30% for GY-HDR and <20% for PR-LDR, significantly lower than the 80% achieved for EBRT. This study highlights the vulnerabilities of Japan’s BT unit QC implementation structure. Addressing these issues requires appropriate training of the RTMP staff to safely perform BT tasks and improvements in practical education and training systems.

Found 
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?