Open Access
Open access
Journal of Radiation Research, volume 66, issue 1, pages 52-64

Clinical workload profile of medical physics professionals at particle therapy Centers: a National Survey in Japan

Seiichi Ota 1, 2
Keisuke Yasui 3, 4
TOSHIYUKI OGATA 5
Yutaro Mori 6
TEIJI NISHIO 7, 8
Naoki Tohyama 9
Hiroyuki Okamoto 10
Masahiko Kurooka 11
Kohei Shimomura 12, 13
Toru Kojima 14
Hiroshi Onishi 15
Show full list: 11 authors
1
 
Division of Radiological Technology , Department of Medical Technology, , 465 Kajii-cho, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566,
3
 
Division of Medical Physics , School of Medical Sciences, , 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukakecho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192,
10
 
Radiation Safety and Quality Assurance Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045,
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-12-09
scimago Q2
SJR0.546
CiteScore3.6
Impact factor1.9
ISSN04493060, 13499157
PubMed ID:  39657763
Abstract

The current research on staffing models is primarily focused on conventional external photon beam therapy, which predominantly involves using linear accelerators. This emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies to understand better and define specific particle therapy facilities’ staffing requirements. In a 2022 survey of 25 particle therapy facilities in Japan with an 84% response rate, significant insights were obtained regarding workload distribution, defined as the product of personnel count and task time (person-minutes), for patient-related tasks and equipment quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC). The survey revealed that machinery QA/QC tasks were particularly demanding, with an average monthly workload of 376.9 min and weekly tasks averaging 162.1 min. In comparison, patient-related workloads focused on treatment planning, exhibiting substantial time commitments, particularly for scanning and passive scattering techniques. The average workloads for treatment planning per patient were 291.3 and 195.4 min, respectively. In addition, specific patient scenarios such as pre-treatment sedation in pediatric cases require longer durations (averaging 84.5 min), which likely include the workloads of not only the physician responsible for sedation but also the radiotherapy technology and medical physics specialists providing support during sedation and the nursing staff involved in sedation care. These findings underscore the significant time investments required for machinery QA/QC and patient-specific treatment planning in particle therapy facilities, along with the need for specialized care procedures in pediatric cases. The results of this survey also emphasized the challenges and staffing requirements to ensure QA/QC in high-precision medical environments.

Found 
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?