Review of Finance

Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

Florian Berg 1
Julian F Kölbel 1, 2
Roberto Rigobon 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-05-23
scimago Q1
SJR7.769
CiteScore7.8
Impact factor5.6
ISSN15723097, 1573692X
Economics and Econometrics
Finance
Accounting
Abstract

This paper investigates the divergence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings based on data from six prominent ESG rating agencies: Kinder, Lydenberg, and Domini (KLD), Sustainalytics, Moody’s ESG (Vigeo-Eiris), S&P Global (RobecoSAM), Refinitiv (Asset4), and MSCI. We document the rating divergence and map the different methodologies onto a common taxonomy of categories. Using this taxonomy, we decompose the divergence into contributions of scope, measurement, and weight. Measurement contributes 56% of the divergence, scope 38%, and weight 6%. Further analyzing the reasons for measurement divergence, we detect a rater effect where a rater’s overall view of a firm influences the measurement of specific categories. The results call for greater attention to how the data underlying ESG ratings are generated.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160

Publishers

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?