Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance

Tiffany T. Yu 1, 2
Anne C Hoyt 1, 2
Melissa M. Joines 1, 2, 3, 4
Cheryce P. Fischer 1, 2, 3, 4
Nazanin Yaghmai 1, 2, 3, 4
James S Chalfant 1, 2
Lucy Chow 1, 2
Shabnam Mortazavi 1, 2, 3, 4
Christopher D Sears 1, 2
James Sayre 3, 4
James W. Sayre 1, 2
JOANN G. ELMORE 1, 5
William Hsu 3, 4
William Y. Hsu 1, 2
Hannah S. Milch 1, 2, 3, 4
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-04-18
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR5.703
CiteScore17.4
Impact factor7.2
ISSN00278874, 14602105
Abstract
Background

European studies suggest that artificial intelligence (AI) can reduce interval breast cancers. Research on interval breast cancer classification and AI’s effectiveness in the United States, however, particularly using digital breast tomosynthesis and annual screening, is limited. We aimed to mammographically classify interval breast cancers and assess AI performance using a 12-month screening interval.

Methods

From digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis screening mammograms acquired between 2010 and 2019 at a US tertiary-care academic center, we identified interval breast cancers diagnosed less than 12 months after a negative mammogram. At least 3 breast radiologists retrospectively classified interval breast cancers as missed—reading error, minimal signs—actionable, minimal signs—nonactionable, true interval, occult, or missed—technical error. A deep-learning AI tool assigned risk scores ranging from 1 to 10 to the negative index screening mammograms, with scores of 8 or higher considered “flagged.” Statistical analysis evaluated associations among interval breast cancer types and AI exam scores, AI markings, and patient and tumor characteristics.

Results

From 184 935 screening mammograms (65% digital mammography, 35% digital breast tomosynthesis), we identified 148 interval breast cancers in 148 women (mean [SD] age = 61 [12] years). Of these, 26% were minimal signs—actionable, 24% were occult, 22% were minimal signs—nonactionable, 17% were missed—reading error, 6% were true interval, and 5% were missed—technical error (P < .001). AI scored 131 mammograms (17 errors excluded); it most frequently flagged exams with missed—reading error (90%), minimal signs—actionable (89%), and minimal signs—nonactionable (72%) (P = .02). AI localized mammographically visible types more accurately (35%-68%) than nonvisible types (0%-50%; P = .02).

Conclusion

AI more frequently flagged and accurately localized interval breast cancer types that were mammographically visible at screening (missed or minimal signs) compared with true interval or occult cancers.

Found 
Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
6
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Yu T. T. et al. Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance // Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2025.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Yu T. T., Hoyt A. C., Joines M. M., Fischer C. P., Yaghmai N., Chalfant J. S., Chow L., Mortazavi S., Sears C. D., Sayre J., Sayre J. W., ELMORE J. G., Hsu W., Hsu W. Y., Milch H. S. Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance // Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2025.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djaf103
UR - https://academic.oup.com/jnci/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jnci/djaf103/8116029
TI - Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance
T2 - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
AU - Yu, Tiffany T.
AU - Hoyt, Anne C
AU - Joines, Melissa M.
AU - Fischer, Cheryce P.
AU - Yaghmai, Nazanin
AU - Chalfant, James S
AU - Chow, Lucy
AU - Mortazavi, Shabnam
AU - Sears, Christopher D
AU - Sayre, James
AU - Sayre, James W.
AU - ELMORE, JOANN G.
AU - Hsu, William
AU - Hsu, William Y.
AU - Milch, Hannah S.
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/04/18
PB - Oxford University Press
SN - 0027-8874
SN - 1460-2105
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Yu,
author = {Tiffany T. Yu and Anne C Hoyt and Melissa M. Joines and Cheryce P. Fischer and Nazanin Yaghmai and James S Chalfant and Lucy Chow and Shabnam Mortazavi and Christopher D Sears and James Sayre and James W. Sayre and JOANN G. ELMORE and William Hsu and William Y. Hsu and Hannah S. Milch},
title = {Mammographic classification of interval breast cancers and artificial intelligence performance},
journal = {Journal of the National Cancer Institute},
year = {2025},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
month = {apr},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/jnci/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jnci/djaf103/8116029},
doi = {10.1093/jnci/djaf103}
}
Profiles