Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction)
Norah Oles
1, 2
,
Halley Darrach
1, 2
,
Wilmina Landford
1, 2
,
Matthew Garza
1, 2
,
Claire Twose
3
,
Chanjun S. Park
1, 2
,
Phuong Tran
1, 2
,
Loren S. Schechter
4
,
Brandyn Lau
5, 6, 7, 8
,
Devin Coon
1, 2
1
Тип публикации: Journal Article
Дата публикации: 2021-09-08
scimago Q1
wos Q1
БС1
SJR: 2.593
CiteScore: 14.4
Impact factor: 6.4
ISSN: 00034932, 15281140
PubMed ID:
34914663
Surgery
Краткое описание
To perform the first systematic review of all available GAS publications across all procedures to assess outcomes reported in the literature and the methods used for outcome assessment.Assessment of GAS results is complex and multidimensional, involving not only complication rates but also anatomic (eg, vaginal depth), functional (eg, urinary), and psychosocial outcomes. A fully comprehensive aggregation of all prior research would offer an essential cornerstone for continued progress.A systematic review was performed after PRISMA guidelines to identify all outcomes measures in GAS cohorts, including patient-centered outcomes, complications, and functional outcomes. Data were aggregated to assess pooled rates of complications, satisfaction, and other outcomes.Overall, 15,186 references were identified, 4162 papers advanced to abstract review, and 1826 underwent full-text review. After review, there were 406 GAS cohort publications, including 171 vaginoplasty, 82 phalloplasty, 16 metoidioplasty, 23 oophorectomy/vaginectomy, and 21 with multiple procedures.Although 68.7% of genitoplasty papers addressed patient-centered outcomes, only 1.0% used metrics validated in the transgender population. Forty-three different outcome instruments were used. No instrument was used in more than 15% of published series and 38 were used in only 1 or 2 publications.Our review found high patient satisfaction for genital procedures but little concordance between study methods, with almost 90% of patient-focused outcome metrics appearing only once or twice. Standardization of outcome instruments and measurement methods through patient-inclusive, multidisciplinary consensus efforts is the essential next step for quality improvement. As GAS continues to mature, building on current foundations with the goal of improving both surgical and patient-reported outcomes is essential.
Найдено
Ничего не найдено, попробуйте изменить настройки фильтра.
Найдено
Ничего не найдено, попробуйте изменить настройки фильтра.
Топ-30
Журналы
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
|
Transgender Health
5 публикаций, 8.47%
|
|
|
International Journal of Transgender Health
5 публикаций, 8.47%
|
|
|
Annals of Plastic Surgery
3 публикации, 5.08%
|
|
|
JAMA network open
3 публикации, 5.08%
|
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
Current Opinion in Urology
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
BJU International
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
Plastic and Aesthetic Research
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
EClinicalMedicine
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Journal of Eating Disorders
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Nature Medicine
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Seminars in Speech and Language
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Cureus
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Pediatric Radiology
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Physician Assistant Clinics
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
FASEB Journal
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Pain Research
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
LGBT Health
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Behavioral Sciences and the Law
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
O&G Open
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Neurourology and Urodynamics
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Laryngoscope
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Издатели
|
2
4
6
8
10
|
|
|
Springer Nature
10 публикаций, 16.95%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
9 публикаций, 15.25%
|
|
|
Wiley
7 публикаций, 11.86%
|
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
6 публикаций, 10.17%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
5 публикаций, 8.47%
|
|
|
Elsevier
5 публикаций, 8.47%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
4 публикации, 6.78%
|
|
|
MDPI
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
2 публикации, 3.39%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
The Endocrine Society
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
BMJ
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
1 публикация, 1.69%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.
Вы ученый?
Создайте профиль, чтобы получать персональные рекомендации коллег, конференций и новых статей.
Метрики
59
Всего цитирований:
59
Цитирований c 2024:
48
(81.36%)
Цитировать
ГОСТ |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Цитировать
ГОСТ
Скопировать
Oles N. et al. Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction) // Annals of Surgery. 2021. Vol. 275. No. 1. p. e67-e74.
ГОСТ со всеми авторами (до 50)
Скопировать
Oles N., Darrach H., Landford W., Garza M., Twose C., Park C. S., Tran P., Schechter L. S., Lau B., Coon D. Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction) // Annals of Surgery. 2021. Vol. 275. No. 1. p. e67-e74.
Цитировать
RIS
Скопировать
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004717
UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004717
TI - Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction)
T2 - Annals of Surgery
AU - Oles, Norah
AU - Darrach, Halley
AU - Landford, Wilmina
AU - Garza, Matthew
AU - Twose, Claire
AU - Park, Chanjun S.
AU - Tran, Phuong
AU - Schechter, Loren S.
AU - Lau, Brandyn
AU - Coon, Devin
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/09/08
PB - Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
SP - e67-e74
IS - 1
VL - 275
PMID - 34914663
SN - 0003-4932
SN - 1528-1140
ER -
Цитировать
BibTex (до 50 авторов)
Скопировать
@article{2021_Oles,
author = {Norah Oles and Halley Darrach and Wilmina Landford and Matthew Garza and Claire Twose and Chanjun S. Park and Phuong Tran and Loren S. Schechter and Brandyn Lau and Devin Coon},
title = {Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction)},
journal = {Annals of Surgery},
year = {2021},
volume = {275},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004717},
number = {1},
pages = {e67--e74},
doi = {10.1097/SLA.0000000000004717}
}
Цитировать
MLA
Скопировать
Oles, Norah, et al. “Gender Affirming Surgery: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of All Peer-reviewed Literature and Methods of Assessing Patient-centered Outcomes (Part 2: Genital Reconstruction).” Annals of Surgery, vol. 275, no. 1, Sep. 2021, pp. e67-e74. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004717.