Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2016-06-26
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 0.955
CiteScore: 4.4
Impact factor: 2.1
ISSN: 02773740, 15364798
PubMed ID:
27348719
Ophthalmology
Abstract
To compare the mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and higher order aberrations (HOAs) at 3 months after femtosecond-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (FS-LASIK), wave front-guided femtosecond LASIK (WF-LASIK), and femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.In this prospective nonrandomized study, 332 right eyes of 332 patients were treated with FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, or FLEx. The HOAs and mesopic CS were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively.At 3 months of follow-up, 98 eyes (96.1%) of the FS-LASIK group, 92 eyes (98.9%) of the WF-LASIK group, and 133 eyes (96.4%) of the FLEx group had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. The HOAs improved from 0.34 μm during preoperative examination to 0.56 μm of the end of the follow-up in the FS-LASIK group, from 0.31 to 0.41 μm in the WF-LASIK group, and from 0.32 to 0.54 μm in the FLEx group (all P < 0.01). At a spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree, a better mesopic CS was observed in the WF-LASIK group (1.47) than in the FS-LASIK (1.36) and FLEx (1.33) groups (P < 0.01); a better mesopic CS with glare was also noted in the WF-LASIK group (1.37) than in the FS-LASIK (1.25) and FLEx (1.29) groups (P < 0.01).The FS-LASIK, WF-LASIK, and FLEx procedures result in comparable refractive results at 3 months postoperatively. However, there is improvement in the mesopic CS and HOAs after WF-LASIK.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Journal of Refractive Surgery
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Oftalmologiya
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Optician
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
SLACK
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
PE Polunina Elizareta Gennadievna
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
Mark Allen Group
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 25%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4
Total citations:
4
Citations from 2024:
1
(25%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Zheng Y. et al. Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction // Cornea. 2016. Vol. 35. No. 8. pp. 1057-1061.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Zheng Y. Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction // Cornea. 2016. Vol. 35. No. 8. pp. 1057-1061.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1097/ico.0000000000000891
UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000891
TI - Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction
T2 - Cornea
AU - Zheng, Yan
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/06/26
PB - Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
SP - 1057-1061
IS - 8
VL - 35
PMID - 27348719
SN - 0277-3740
SN - 1536-4798
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2016_Zheng,
author = {Yan Zheng},
title = {Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction},
journal = {Cornea},
year = {2016},
volume = {35},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000891},
number = {8},
pages = {1057--1061},
doi = {10.1097/ico.0000000000000891}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Zheng, Yan, et al. “Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Femtosecond LASIK, Wave Front-Guided Femtosecond LASIK, and Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction.” Cornea, vol. 35, no. 8, Jun. 2016, pp. 1057-1061. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000891.