Abstract
In silicomodeling of transcriptional responses to perturbations is crucial for advancing our understanding of cellular processes and disease mechanisms. We present PertEval-scFM, a standardized framework designed to evaluate models for perturbation effect prediction. We apply PertEval-scFM to benchmark zero-shot single-cell foundation model (scFM) embeddings against simpler baseline models to assess whether these contextualized representations enhance perturbation effect prediction. Our results show that scFM embeddings do not provide consistent improvements over baseline models, especially under distribution shift. Additionally, all models struggle with predicting strong or atypical perturbation effects. Overall, this study provides a systematic evaluation of zero-shot scFM embeddings for perturbation effect prediction, highlighting the challenges of this task and revealing the limitations of current-generation scFMs. Our findings underscore the need for specialized models and high-quality datasets that capture a broader range of cellular states. Source code and documentation can be found at:
Топ-30
Журналы
|
1
2
|
|
|
Genome Biology
2 публикации, 9.09%
|
|
|
Frontiers of Digital Education
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Nature Communications
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Nature Methods
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Nature Biotechnology
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Briefings in Bioinformatics
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Nature Reviews Genetics
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
Nature Machine Intelligence
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Издатели
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
13 публикаций, 59.09%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
8 публикаций, 36.36%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 публикация, 4.55%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
|
- Мы не учитываем публикации, у которых нет DOI.
- Статистика публикаций обновляется еженедельно.