Clinical and functional analysis of the germline TP53 p.K164E acetylation site variant

Tomasello G., Gambini D., Petrelli F., Azzollini J., Arcanà C., Ghidini M., Peissel B., Manoukian S., Garrone O.

•Prevalence of HER2 positivity in BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer is poorly described.•In our series we found a 7% HER2 positivity rate among all first BRCA1/2 BCs.•Following the systematic review, the pooled rate of BRCAmut/HER2-positive BCs is ∼9%.•Compared with BRCA1, prevalence of HER2 positivity among BRCA2 is higher.•More research is needed to better characterize this subgroup of patients. BackgroundPathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes account for ∼6% of breast and 20% of ovarian cancers. Most breast tumors developed by BRCA1 carriers are triple negative. BRCA2 tumors have similar rates of estrogen receptor positivity as sporadic controls but are less likely to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity among breast cancers (BCs) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is poorly and variably described, ranging from 0% to 10% and 0% to 13% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, respectively.Patients and methodsWe assessed the prevalence of HER2 positivity among a single institutional cohort of 398 BCs developed in carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs (240 BRCA1, 158 BRCA2). Subsequently, a systematic review of the literature and pooled analysis was carried out.ResultsIn our series we found a 7% HER2 positivity rate among all first BRCA1/2 BCs overall. In BRCA1 carriers, 5.4% of BCs were HER2-positive compared with 9.5% in BRCA2-mutated patients. Among bilateral BCs, HER2-positive cases were 15.2% in the BRCA1 group and 23.1% in the BRCA2 group. Notably, six BRCA1 and eight BRCA2 carriers showed discordant HER2 status between BC and bilateral BC (23.7%, 14/59). The systematic review included 21 083 BRCA1/2 patients from 73 eligible studies. The pooled rate of BRCAmut/HER2-positive BCs is 9.1% (95% confidence interval 7.3% to 11.2%). BRCA1 and BRCA2 when reported as separate data ranged from 0% to 33.3% (mean 8.3%) and from 0% to 86% (mean 10.3%), respectively.ConclusionsAs compared with sporadic cases, BCs occurring in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 PVs carriers are less frequently HER2-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity in our series was consistent with pooled analysis and did not exceed 10%. Although not common, co-existence of BRCA mutations and HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification should be acknowledged. More research is needed to better characterize this subgroup of patients who should not be excluded a priori from clinical trials of targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-driven cancers. Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes account for ∼6% of breast and 20% of ovarian cancers. Most breast tumors developed by BRCA1 carriers are triple negative. BRCA2 tumors have similar rates of estrogen receptor positivity as sporadic controls but are less likely to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity among breast cancers (BCs) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is poorly and variably described, ranging from 0% to 10% and 0% to 13% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, respectively. We assessed the prevalence of HER2 positivity among a single institutional cohort of 398 BCs developed in carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs (240 BRCA1, 158 BRCA2). Subsequently, a systematic review of the literature and pooled analysis was carried out. In our series we found a 7% HER2 positivity rate among all first BRCA1/2 BCs overall. In BRCA1 carriers, 5.4% of BCs were HER2-positive compared with 9.5% in BRCA2-mutated patients. Among bilateral BCs, HER2-positive cases were 15.2% in the BRCA1 group and 23.1% in the BRCA2 group. Notably, six BRCA1 and eight BRCA2 carriers showed discordant HER2 status between BC and bilateral BC (23.7%, 14/59). The systematic review included 21 083 BRCA1/2 patients from 73 eligible studies. The pooled rate of BRCAmut/HER2-positive BCs is 9.1% (95% confidence interval 7.3% to 11.2%). BRCA1 and BRCA2 when reported as separate data ranged from 0% to 33.3% (mean 8.3%) and from 0% to 86% (mean 10.3%), respectively. As compared with sporadic cases, BCs occurring in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 PVs carriers are less frequently HER2-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity in our series was consistent with pooled analysis and did not exceed 10%. Although not common, co-existence of BRCA mutations and HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification should be acknowledged. More research is needed to better characterize this subgroup of patients who should not be excluded a priori from clinical trials of targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-driven cancers.

Pinto E.M., Maxwell K.N., Halalsheh H., Phillips A., Powers J., MacFarland S., Walsh M.F., Breen K., Formiga M.N., Kriwacki R., Nichols K.E., Mostafavi R., Wang J., Clay M.R., Rodriguez-Galindo C., et. al.

Abstract Germline TP53 splicing variants are uncommon, and their clinical relevance is unknown. However, splice-altering variants at exon 4–intron 4 junctions are relatively enriched in pediatric adrenocortical tumors (ACT). Nevertheless, family histories of cancer compatible with classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome are rarely seen in these patients. We used conventional and in silico assays to determine protein stability, splicing, and transcriptional activity of 10 TP53 variants at exon 4–intron 4 junctions and analyzed their clinical correlates. We reviewed public databases that report the impact of TP53 variants in human cancer and examined individual reports, focusing on family history of cancer. TP53 exon 4–intron 4 junction germline variants were identified in 9 of 75 pediatric ACTs enrolled in the International Pediatric Adrenocortical Tumor Registry and Children's Oncology Group ARAR0332 study. An additional eight independent TP53 variants involving exon 4 splicing were identified in the Pediatric Cancer Genome Project (n = 5,213). These variants resulted in improper expression due to ineffective splicing, protein instability, altered subcellular localization, and loss of function. Clinical case review of carriers of TP53 exon 4–intron 4 junction variants revealed a high incidence of pediatric ACTs and atypical tumor types not consistent with classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Germline variants involving TP53 exon 4–intron 4 junctions are frequent in ACT and rare in other pediatric tumors. The collective impact of these germline TP53 variants on the fidelity of splicing, protein structure, and function must be considered in evaluating cancer susceptibility. Implications: Taken together, the data indicate that splice variants at TP53 codon 125 and surrounding bases differentially impacted p53 gene expression and function.

Tutt A.N., Garber J.E., Kaufman B., Viale G., Fumagalli D., Rastogi P., Gelber R.D., de Azambuja E., Fielding A., Balmaña J., Domchek S.M., Gelmon K.A., Hollingsworth S.J., Korde L.A., Linderholm B., et. al.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors target cancers with defects in homologous recombination repair by synthetic lethality. New therapies are needed to reduce recurrence in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation-associated early breast cancer.We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial involving patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors who had received local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to 1 year of oral olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival.A total of 1836 patients underwent randomization. At a prespecified event-driven interim analysis with a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 3-year invasive disease-free survival was 85.9% in the olaparib group and 77.1% in the placebo group (difference, 8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 to 13.0; hazard ratio for invasive disease or death, 0.58; 99.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.82; P

Evans D.G., van Veen E.M., Byers H.J., Evans S.J., Burghel G.J., Woodward E.R., Harkness E.F., Eccles D.M., Greville-Haygate S.L., Ellingford J.M., Bowers N.L., Pereira M., Wallace A.J., Howell S.J., Howell A., et. al.

BackgroundWhile the likelihood of identifying constitutional breast cancer-associated BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 pathogenic variants (PVs) increases with earlier diagnosis age, little is known about the correlation with age at diagnosis in other predisposition genes. Here, we assessed the contribution of known breast cancer-associated genes to very early onset disease.MethodsSequencing of BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and CHEK2 c.1100delC was undertaken in women with breast cancer diagnosed ≤30 years. Those testing negative were screened for PVs in a minimum of eight additional breast cancer-associated genes. Rates of PVs were compared with cases ≤30 years from the Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic vs Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) study.ResultsTesting 379 women with breast cancer aged ≤30 years identified 75 PVs (19.7%) in BRCA1, 35 (9.2%) in BRCA2, 22 (5.8%) in TP53 and 2 (0.5%) CHEK2 c.1100delC. Extended screening of 184 PV negative women only identified eight additional actionable PVs. BRCA1/2 PVs were more common in women aged 26–30 years than in younger women (p=0.0083) although the younger age group had rates more similar to those in the POSH cohort. Out of 26 women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) alone, most were high-grade and 11/26 (42.3%) had a PV (TP53=6, BRCA2=2, BRCA1=2, PALB2=1). This PV yield is similar to the 61 (48.8%) BRCA1/2 PVs identified in 125 women with triple-negative breast cancer. The POSH cohort specifically excluded pure DCIS which may explain lower TP53 PV rates in this group (1.7%).ConclusionThe rates of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 PVs are high in very early onset breast cancer, with limited benefit from testing of additional breast cancer-associated genes.

Fortuno C., Lee K., Olivier M., Pesaran T., Mai P.L., Andrade K.C., Attardi L.D., Crowley S., Evans D.G., Feng B., Foreman A.K., Frone M.N., Huether R., James P.A., McGoldrick K., et. al.

Germline pathogenic variants in TP53 are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a cancer predisposition disorder inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern associated with a high risk of malignancy, including early-onset breast cancers, sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, and brain tumors. Intense cancer surveillance for individuals with TP53 germline pathogenic variants is associated with reduced cancer-related mortality. Accurate and consistent classification of germline variants across clinical and research laboratories is important to ensure appropriate cancer surveillance recommendations. Here, we describe the work performed by the Clinical Genome Resource TP53 Variant Curation Expert Panel (ClinGen TP53 VCEP) focused on specifying the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for germline variant classification to the TP53 gene. Specifications were developed for 20 ACMG/AMP criteria, while nine were deemed not applicable. The original strength level for the 10 criteria was also adjusted due to current evidence. Use of TP53-specific guidelines and sharing of clinical data among experts and clinical laboratories led to a decrease in variants of uncertain significance from 28% to 12% compared with the original guidelines. The ClinGen TP53 VCEP recommends the use of these TP53-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines as the standard strategy for TP53 germline variant classification.

Kwong A., Shin V.Y., Ho C.Y., Au C.H., Slavin T.P., Weitzel J.N., Chan T., Ma E.S.

Germline TP53 mutations are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a severe and rare hereditary cancer syndrome. Despite the rarity of germline TP53 mutations, the clinical implication for mutation carriers and their families is significant. The risk management of TP53 germline mutation carriers is more stringent than BRCA carriers, and radiotherapy should be avoided when possible. TP53 gene mutation screening was performed in 2538 Chinese breast cancer patients who tested negative for BRCA mutations. Twenty TP53 mutations were identified with high next-generation sequencing concerning for germline mutations in Chinese breast cancer families. The majorities of the TP53 carriers had early-onset, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and had strong family history of cancer. Among all, 11 patients carried a germline mutation and 6 of which were likely de novo germline mutations. In addition, 1 case was suspected to be induced by chemotherapy or radiation, as this patient had no significant family history of cancer and aberrant clonal expansion can commonly include TP53 mutations. Furthermore, we have identified one mosaic LFS case. Two novel mutations (c.524_547dup and c.529_546del) were identified in patients with early-onset. In view of the high lifetime risk of malignancy, identification of patients with germline TP53 mutations are important for clinicians to aid in accurate risk assessment and offer surveillance for patients and their families.

Pinto E.M., Figueiredo B.C., Chen W., Galvao H.C., Formiga M.N., Fragoso M.C., Ashton-Prolla P., Ribeiro E.M., Felix G., Costa T.E., Savage S.A., Yeager M., Palmero E.I., Volc S., Salvador H., et. al.

The XAF1 -E134* variant increases the cancer risk for carriers of the TP53 -R337H allele.

Fortuno C., Mester J., Pesaran T., Weitzel J.N., Dolinsky J., Yussuf A., McGoldrick K., Garber J.E., Savage S.A., Khincha P.P., Gareth Evans D., Achatz M.I., Nichols K.E., Maxwell K.N., Schiffman J.D., et. al.

Early onset breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, caused by germline TP53 pathogenic variants. It has repeatedly been suggested that breast tumors from TP53 carriers are more likely to be HER2+ than those of noncarriers, but this information has not been incorporated into variant interpretation models for TP53. Breast tumor pathology is already being used quantitatively for assessing pathogenicity of germline variants in other genes, and it has been suggested that this type of evidence can be incorporated into current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines for germline variant classification. Here, by reviewing published data and using internal datasets separated by different age groups, we investigated if breast tumor HER2+ status has utility as a predictor of TP53 germline variant pathogenicity, considering age at diagnosis. Overall, our results showed that the identification of HER2+ breast tumors diagnosed before the age of 40 can be conservatively incorporated into the current TP53-specific ACMG/AMP PP4 criterion, following a point system detailed in this manuscript. Further larger studies will be needed to reassess the value of HER2+ breast tumors diagnosed at a later age.

Frebourg T., Bajalica Lagercrantz S., Oliveira C., Magenheim R., Evans D.G.

Fifty years after the recognition of the Li–Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), our perception of cancers related to germline alterations of TP53 has drastically changed: (i) germline TP53 alterations are often identified among children with cancers, in particular soft-tissue sarcomas, adrenocortical carcinomas, central nervous system tumours, or among adult females with early breast cancers, without familial history. This justifies the expansion of the LFS concept to a wider cancer predisposition syndrome designated heritable TP53-related cancer (hTP53rc) syndrome; (ii) the interpretation of germline TP53 variants remains challenging and should integrate epidemiological, phenotypical, bioinformatics prediction, and functional data; (iii) the penetrance of germline disease-causing TP53 variants is variable, depending both on the type of variant (dominant-negative variants being associated with a higher cancer risk) and on modifying factors; (iv) whole-body MRI (WBMRI) allows early detection of tumours in variant carriers and (v) in cancer patients with germline disease-causing TP53 variants, radiotherapy, and conventional genotoxic chemotherapy contribute to the development of subsequent primary tumours. It is critical to perform TP53 testing before the initiation of treatment in order to avoid in carriers, if possible, radiotherapy and genotoxic chemotherapies. In children, the recommendations are to perform clinical examination and abdominal ultrasound every 6 months, annual WBMRI and brain MRI from the first year of life, if the TP53 variant is known to be associated with childhood cancers. In adults, the surveillance should include every year clinical examination, WBMRI, breast MRI in females from 20 until 65 years and brain MRI until 50 years.

Federici G., Soddu S.

The promising expectations about personalized medicine have opened the path to routine large-scale sequencing and increased the importance of genetic counseling for hereditary cancers, among which hereditary breast and ovary cancers (HBOC) have a major impact. High-throughput sequencing, or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), has improved cancer patient management, ameliorating diagnosis and treatment decisions. In addition to its undeniable clinical utility, NGS is also unveiling a large number of variants that we are still not able to clearly define and classify, the variants of uncertain significance (VUS), which account for about 40% of total variants. At present, VUS use in the clinical context is challenging. Medical reports may omit this kind of data and, even when included, they limit the clinical utility of genetic information. This has prompted the scientific community to seek easily applicable tests to accurately classify VUS and increase the amount of usable information from NGS data. In this review, we will focus on NGS and classification systems for VUS investigation, with particular attention on HBOC-related genes and in vitro functional tests developed for ameliorating and accelerating variant classification in cancer.

Kendig R.D., Kai F., Fry E.A., Inoue K.

Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., Voelkerding K., Rehm H.L.

Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines were developed primarily as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines is voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These Standards and Guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the clinical laboratory geneticist should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. Clinical laboratory geneticists are encouraged to document in the patient’s record the rationale for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with these Standards and Guidelines. They also are advised to take notice of the date any particular guideline was adopted and to consider other relevant medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures.The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) previously developed guidance for the interpretation of sequence variants.1 In the past decade, sequencing technology has evolved rapidly with the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing. By adopting and leveraging next-generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are now performing an ever-increasing catalogue of genetic testing spanning genotyping, single genes, gene panels, exomes, genomes, transcriptomes, and epigenetic assays for genetic disorders. By virtue of increased complexity, this shift in genetic testing has been accompanied by new challenges in sequence interpretation. In this context the ACMG convened a workgroup in 2013 comprising representatives from the ACMG, the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the College of American Pathologists to revisit and revise the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants. The group consisted of clinical laboratory directors and clinicians. This report represents expert opinion of the workgroup with input from ACMG, AMP, and College of American Pathologists stakeholders. These recommendations primarily apply to the breadth of genetic tests used in clinical laboratories, including genotyping, single genes, panels, exomes, and genomes. This report recommends the use of specific standard terminology—“pathogenic,” “likely pathogenic,” “uncertain significance,” “likely benign,” and “benign”—to describe variants identified in genes that cause Mendelian disorders. Moreover, this recommendation describes a process for classifying variants into these five categories based on criteria using typical types of variant evidence (e.g., population data, computational data, functional data, segregation data). Because of the increased complexity of analysis and interpretation of clinical genetic testing described in this report, the ACMG strongly recommends that clinical molecular genetic testing should be performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments–approved laboratory, with results interpreted by a board-certified clinical molecular geneticist or molecular genetic pathologist or the equivalent.Genet Med 17 5, 405–423.

Silwal-Pandit L., Vollan H.K., Chin S., Rueda O.M., McKinney S., Osako T., Quigley D.A., Kristensen V.N., Aparicio S., Børresen-Dale A., Caldas C., Langerød A.

Abstract Purpose: In breast cancer, the TP53 gene is frequently mutated and the mutations have been associated with poor prognosis. The prognostic impact of the different types of TP53 mutations across the different molecular subtypes is still poorly understood. Here, we characterize the spectrum and prognostic significance of TP53 mutations with respect to the PAM50 subtypes and integrative clusters (IC). Experimental Design: TP53 mutation status was obtained for 1,420 tumor samples from the METABRIC cohort by sequencing all coding exons using the Sanger method. Results: TP53 mutations were found in 28.3% of the tumors, conferring a worse overall and breast cancer-specific survival [HR = 2.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.65–2.48, P < 0.001], and were also found to be an independent marker of poor prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive cases (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.39–2.49, P < 0.001). The mutation spectrum of TP53 varied between the breast cancer subtypes, and individual alterations showed subtype-specific association. TP53 mutations were associated with increased mortality in patients with luminal B, HER2-enriched, and normal-like tumors, but not in patients with luminal A and basal-like tumors. Similar observations were made in ICs, where mutation associated with poorer outcome in IC1, IC4, and IC5. The combined effect of TP53 mutation, TP53 LOH, and MDM2 amplification on mortality was additive. Conclusion: This study reveals that TP53 mutations have different clinical relevance in molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and suggests diverse roles for TP53 in the biology underlying breast cancer development. Clin Cancer Res; 20(13); 3569–80. ©2014 AACR.

Duzkale H., Shen J., McLaughlin H., Alfares A., Kelly M., Pugh T., Funke B., Rehm H., Lebo M.

Molecular genetic testing informs diagnosis, prognosis, and risk assessment for patients and their family members. Recent advances in low-cost, high-throughput DNA sequencing and computing technologies have enabled the rapid expansion of genetic test content, resulting in dramatically increased numbers of DNA variants identified per test. To address this challenge, our laboratory has developed a systematic approach to thorough and efficient assessments of variants for pathogenicity determination. We first search for existing data in publications and databases including internal, collaborative and public resources. We then perform full evidence-based assessments through statistical analyses of observations in the general population and disease cohorts, evaluation of experimental data from in vivo or in vitro studies, and computational predictions of potential impacts of each variant. Finally, we weigh all evidence to reach an overall conclusion on the potential for each variant to be disease causing. In this report, we highlight the principles of variant assessment, address the caveats and pitfalls, and provide examples to illustrate the process. By sharing our experience and providing a framework for variant assessment, including access to a freely available customizable tool, we hope to help move towards standardized and consistent approaches to variant assessment.

Goldhirsch A., Winer E.P., Coates A.S., Gelber R.D., Piccart-Gebhart M., Thürlimann B., Senn H.-., Albain K.S., André F., Bergh J., Bonnefoi H., Bretel-Morales D., Burstein H., Cardoso F., Castiglione-Gertsch M., et. al.

The 13th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (2013) Expert Panel reviewed and endorsed substantial new evidence on aspects of the local and regional therapies for early breast cancer, supporting less extensive surgery to the axilla and shorter durations of radiation therapy. It refined its earlier approach to the classification and management of luminal disease in the absence of amplification or overexpression of the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene, while retaining essentially unchanged recommendations for the systemic adjuvant therapy of HER2-positive and 'triple-negative' disease. The Panel again accepted that conventional clinico-pathological factors provided a surrogate subtype classification, while noting that in those areas of the world where multi-gene molecular assays are readily available many clinicians prefer to base chemotherapy decisions for patients with luminal disease on these genomic results rather than the surrogate subtype definitions. Several multi-gene molecular assays were recognized as providing accurate and reproducible prognostic information, and in some cases prediction of response to chemotherapy. Cost and availability preclude their application in many environments at the present time. Broad treatment recommendations are presented. Such recommendations do not imply that each Panel member agrees: indeed, among more than 100 questions, only one (trastuzumab duration) commanded 100% agreement. The various recommendations in fact carried differing degrees of support, as reflected in the nuanced wording of the text below and in the votes recorded in supplementary Appendix S1, available at Annals of Oncology online. Detailed decisions on treatment will as always involve clinical consideration of disease extent, host factors, patient preferences and social and economic constraints.