volume 110 issue 10 publication number 106010

Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable?

George Alestas 1
Matilda Delgado 1
Ignacio Ruiz 1, 2
Y. Akrami 1, 3, 4
Miquel Montero 1
Savvas Nesseris 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-11-19
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.458
CiteScore9.0
Impact factor5.3
ISSN24700010, 24700029, 05562821, 10894918, 15507998, 15502368
Abstract

Single-field models of accelerated expansion with nearly flat potentials, despite being able to provide observationally viable explanations for the early-time cosmic inflation and the late-time cosmic acceleration, are in strong tension with string theory evidence and the associated de Sitter swampland constraints. It has recently been argued that in an open universe, where the spatial curvature is negative (i.e., with Ωk>0), a new stable fixed point arises, which may lead to viable single-field-based accelerated expansion with an arbitrarily steep potential. Here, we show, through a dynamical systems analysis and a Bayesian statistical inference of cosmological parameters, that the additional cosmological solutions based on the new fixed point do not render steep-potential, single-field, accelerated expansion observationally viable. We mainly focus on quintessence models of dark energy, but we also argue that a similar conclusion can be drawn for cosmic inflation.

Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
3 publications, 33.33%
Physica Scripta
1 publication, 11.11%
Physical Review Letters
1 publication, 11.11%
Physics of the Dark Universe
1 publication, 11.11%
Journal of High Energy Physics
1 publication, 11.11%
Physical Review D
1 publication, 11.11%
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
1 publication, 11.11%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
IOP Publishing
4 publications, 44.44%
American Physical Society (APS)
2 publications, 22.22%
Elsevier
1 publication, 11.11%
Springer Nature
1 publication, 11.11%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 11.11%
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
9
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Alestas G. et al. Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable? // Physical Review D. 2024. Vol. 110. No. 10. 106010
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Alestas G., Delgado M., Ruiz I., Akrami Y., Montero M., Nesseris S. Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable? // Physical Review D. 2024. Vol. 110. No. 10. 106010
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1103/physrevd.110.106010
UR - https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.106010
TI - Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable?
T2 - Physical Review D
AU - Alestas, George
AU - Delgado, Matilda
AU - Ruiz, Ignacio
AU - Akrami, Y.
AU - Montero, Miquel
AU - Nesseris, Savvas
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/11/19
PB - American Physical Society (APS)
IS - 10
VL - 110
SN - 2470-0010
SN - 2470-0029
SN - 0556-2821
SN - 1089-4918
SN - 1550-7998
SN - 1550-2368
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Alestas,
author = {George Alestas and Matilda Delgado and Ignacio Ruiz and Y. Akrami and Miquel Montero and Savvas Nesseris},
title = {Is curvature-assisted quintessence observationally viable?},
journal = {Physical Review D},
year = {2024},
volume = {110},
publisher = {American Physical Society (APS)},
month = {nov},
url = {https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.106010},
number = {10},
pages = {106010},
doi = {10.1103/physrevd.110.106010}
}