volume 12 issue 3 pages 159-169

Clinical coding: how accurately is it done?

Y. Bajaj 1
J. Crabtree 2
A.G. Tucker 2
1
 
(Yorkshire Deanery, Leeds, UK)
2
 
Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2007-08-14
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN14777274
Health Policy
Abstract
Purpose

Clinical coding is a process of accurate translation of written medical terms into codes. The Payment by Results initiative has focused attention on the quality of clinical coded data as all income for in patient services is derived from coded clinical data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of clinical coded data by making comparisons between the information held on the dialect encoder system and the information recorded in the clinical case notes.

Design/methodology/approach

The 50 episodes for this study were randomly selected from a list of all episodes ending August 2005 within the ENT specialty in a teaching hospital.

Findings

There were only 17 (34 per cent) episodes with a structured summary within the case notes. Of the 50 recorded primary diagnoses 42 (84 per cent) were correctly coded. Of the 43 recorded primary procedures, 37 (86 per cent) were correctly coded.

Originality/value

This study promotes a better awareness of the impact of poor coding and gives recommendations that will be helpful to those involved in coding processes.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
1 publication, 14.29%
Health Information Management Journal
1 publication, 14.29%
Journal of Medical Systems
1 publication, 14.29%
Journal of Social Policy
1 publication, 14.29%
International Journal of Health Planning and Management
1 publication, 14.29%
Journal of Medical Internet Research
1 publication, 14.29%
Journal of Hospital Infection
1 publication, 14.29%
1

Publishers

1
2
SAGE
2 publications, 28.57%
Springer Nature
1 publication, 14.29%
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 14.29%
Wiley
1 publication, 14.29%
JMIR Publications
1 publication, 14.29%
Elsevier
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Bajaj Y. et al. Clinical coding: how accurately is it done? // Clinical Governance An International Journal. 2007. Vol. 12. No. 3. pp. 159-169.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Bajaj Y., Crabtree J., Tucker A. Clinical coding: how accurately is it done? // Clinical Governance An International Journal. 2007. Vol. 12. No. 3. pp. 159-169.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1108/14777270710775873
UR - https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14777270710775873/full/html
TI - Clinical coding: how accurately is it done?
T2 - Clinical Governance An International Journal
AU - Bajaj, Y.
AU - Crabtree, J.
AU - Tucker, A.G.
PY - 2007
DA - 2007/08/14
PB - Emerald
SP - 159-169
IS - 3
VL - 12
SN - 1477-7274
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2007_Bajaj,
author = {Y. Bajaj and J. Crabtree and A.G. Tucker},
title = {Clinical coding: how accurately is it done?},
journal = {Clinical Governance An International Journal},
year = {2007},
volume = {12},
publisher = {Emerald},
month = {aug},
url = {https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14777270710775873/full/html},
number = {3},
pages = {159--169},
doi = {10.1108/14777270710775873}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Bajaj, Y., et al. “Clinical coding: how accurately is it done?.” Clinical Governance An International Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, Aug. 2007, pp. 159-169. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14777270710775873/full/html.