Publication type: Proceedings Article
Publication date: 2017-09-01
Abstract
This work aims to apply visual-attention modeling to attention-based video compression. During our comparison we found that eye-tracking data collected even from a single observer outperforms existing automatic models by a significant margin. Therefore, we offer a semiautomatic approach: using computer-vision algorithms and good initial estimation of eye-tracking data from just one observer to produce high-quality saliency maps that are similar to multi-observer eye tracking and that are appropriate for practical applications. We propose a simple algorithm that is based on temporal coherence of the visual-attention distribution and requires eye tracking of just one observer. The results are as good as an average gaze map for two observers. While preparing the saliency-model comparison, we paid special attention to the quality-measurement procedure. We observe that many modern visual-attention models can be improved by applying simple transforms such as brightness adjustment and blending with the center-prior model. The novel quality-evaluation procedure that we propose is invariant to such transforms. To show the practical use of our semiautomatic approach, we developed a saliency-aware modification of the x264 video encoder and performed subjective and objective evaluations. The modified encoder can serve with any attention model and is publicly available.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
|
|
|
Multimedia Tools and Applications
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Journal of Signal Processing Systems
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
IEEE Access
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Neurocomputing
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
9 publications, 52.94%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
4 publications, 23.53%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
2 publications, 11.76%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 5.88%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
17
Total citations:
17
Citations from 2025:
2
(11.76%)
Profiles