Open Access
Open access
volume 8 pages 106799-106810

Weakly Supervised Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on Students’ Reviews of MOOCs

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-06-08
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.849
CiteScore9.0
Impact factor3.6
ISSN21693536
General Materials Science
General Engineering
General Computer Science
Abstract
Students' feedback is an effective mechanism that provides valuable insights about teaching-learning process. Handling opinions of students expressed in reviews is a quite labour-intensive and tedious task as it is typically performed manually by the human intervention. While this task may be viable for small-scale courses that involve just a few students' feedback, it is unpractical for large-scale cases as it applies to online courses in general, and MOOCs, in particular. Therefore, to address this issue, we propose in this paper a framework to automatically analyzing opinions of students expressed in reviews. Specifically, the framework relies on aspect-level sentiment analysis and aims to automatically identify sentiment or opinion polarity expressed towards a given aspect related to the MOOC. The proposed framework takes advantage of weakly supervised annotation of MOOC-related aspects and propagates the weak supervision signal to effectively identify the aspect categories discussed in the unlabeled students' reviews. Consequently, it significantly reduces the need for manually annotated data which is the main bottleneck for all deep learning techniques. A large-scale real-world education dataset containing around 105k students' reviews collected from Coursera and a dataset comprising of 5989 students' feedback in traditional classroom settings are used to perform experiments. The experimental results indicate that our proposed framework attains inspiring performance with respect to both the aspect category identification and the aspect sentiment classification. Moreover, the results suggest that the framework leads to more accurate results than the expensive and labour-intensive sentiment analysis techniques relying heavily on manually labelled data.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
IEEE Access
13 publications, 10.24%
Communications in Computer and Information Science
7 publications, 5.51%
Sustainability
3 publications, 2.36%
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
3 publications, 2.36%
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
3 publications, 2.36%
PeerJ Computer Science
2 publications, 1.57%
Electronics (Switzerland)
2 publications, 1.57%
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
2 publications, 1.57%
Education and Information Technologies
2 publications, 1.57%
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
2 publications, 1.57%
Cybernetics and Systems
2 publications, 1.57%
Multimedia Tools and Applications
2 publications, 1.57%
Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
2 publications, 1.57%
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
2 publications, 1.57%
Procedia Computer Science
2 publications, 1.57%
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
2 publications, 1.57%
International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education
1 publication, 0.79%
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
1 publication, 0.79%
Computers, Materials and Continua
1 publication, 0.79%
AI
1 publication, 0.79%
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
1 publication, 0.79%
Wireless Personal Communications
1 publication, 0.79%
Web Semantics
1 publication, 0.79%
Egyptian Informatics Journal
1 publication, 0.79%
Natural Language Processing Journal
1 publication, 0.79%
Microprocessors and Microsystems
1 publication, 0.79%
Materials Today: Proceedings
1 publication, 0.79%
Global Transitions Proceedings
1 publication, 0.79%
Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
1 publication, 0.79%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
46 publications, 36.22%
Springer Nature
26 publications, 20.47%
MDPI
15 publications, 11.81%
Elsevier
12 publications, 9.45%
IGI Global
4 publications, 3.15%
Hindawi Limited
4 publications, 3.15%
Taylor & Francis
4 publications, 3.15%
Wiley
3 publications, 2.36%
PeerJ
2 publications, 1.57%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 0.79%
Tech Science Press
1 publication, 0.79%
AIP Publishing
1 publication, 0.79%
SAGE
1 publication, 0.79%
Emerald
1 publication, 0.79%
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
1 publication, 0.79%
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
127
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kastrati Z. et al. Weakly Supervised Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on Students’ Reviews of MOOCs // IEEE Access. 2020. Vol. 8. pp. 106799-106810.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kastrati Z., Imran A. S., Kurti A. Weakly Supervised Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on Students’ Reviews of MOOCs // IEEE Access. 2020. Vol. 8. pp. 106799-106810.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1109/access.2020.3000739
UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3000739
TI - Weakly Supervised Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on Students’ Reviews of MOOCs
T2 - IEEE Access
AU - Kastrati, Zenun
AU - Imran, Ali Shariq
AU - Kurti, Arianit
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/06/08
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
SP - 106799-106810
VL - 8
SN - 2169-3536
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Kastrati,
author = {Zenun Kastrati and Ali Shariq Imran and Arianit Kurti},
title = {Weakly Supervised Framework for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis on Students’ Reviews of MOOCs},
journal = {IEEE Access},
year = {2020},
volume = {8},
publisher = {Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3000739},
pages = {106799--106810},
doi = {10.1109/access.2020.3000739}
}