A Novel Scale for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Ground‐Glass Nodules: A Multicenter and Ambispective Cohort Study
ABSTRACT
Background
A screening tool was devised to aid the diagnosis and treatment of ground‐glass nodules (GGNs).
Methods
The current ambispective cohort study included retrospective collation of 20 variables synthesizing a patient's clinical characteristics, serum tumor markers, and CT results, which allowed division into noninvasive (benign, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, and adenocarcinoma in situ) and invasive (minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinomas) tumors to build a prediction nomogram and GGN screening scale. The model was verified internally. A prospective cohort of patients was randomly divided by envelope method into those assessed by the GGN screening scale and those assessed via CT values. The diagnostic efficiencies were compared to allow external verification of the model.
Result
A total of 223 patients with 225 GGNs were recruited into the retrospective cohort between January 2021 and December 2022. Multivariable analysis showed sex, diameter, air bronchogram, and vessel convergence sign to be independent factors for prediction of noninvasive and invasive GGNs. Internal verification showed the model had a sensitivity of 70.7% and specificity of 75.0% with the Youden index at 0.457 and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.734–0.852). Calibration curves indicated good internal stability (p = 0.357). Between January 2023 and March 2023, 147 patients with 148 GGNs were recruited into the prospective cohort. External verification showed the model had a sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 40.0% with the Youden index at 0.324 and AUC of 0.678 (95% CI: 0.509–0.847). Calibration curves indicated good external stability (p = 0.088). The scale was shown to have a sensitivity of 75.00%, specificity of 37.50%, positive predictive value of 91.53%, negative predictive value of 14.29%, and accuracy of 71.25%.
Conclusion
The GGN screening scale has high sensitivity and accuracy, making it suitable for diagnosis of GGNs.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 100%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
|
|
|
Springer Nature
1 publication, 100%
|
|
|
1
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.