Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus
1
Department of Ethology; Institute of Animal Science; Praha - Uhříněves Czech Republic
|
2
Ostrava Zoo; Ostrava Czech Republic
|
3
Basel Zoo; Basel Switzerland
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2015-01-21
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR: 0.566
CiteScore: 3.0
Impact factor: 1.4
ISSN: 01791613, 14390310
Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Abstract
Social and reproductive systems remain among the main predictors affecting mammalian birth sex ratio. The two extant hippopotamus species differ in their social and reproductive systems. While common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) form herds and tend to be polygynous, solitary living pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis) are promiscuous. Although it is one of the most studied topics, only few empirical studies using large sample sizes have reported distorted birth sex ratio. We examined the birth sex ratio in both hippopotamus species using international studbooks including large data sets exceeding a thousand individuals (1138 for common hippopotamus and 1161 for pygmy ones). In both species, the birth sex ratio differed from 1:1. Whereas more males than females were recorded in common hippopotamus (53.9% males), the opposite was found in pygmy hippopotamus (41.5% males). We also found that the birth sex ratio was affected by individual dams in common hippopotamus, and by individual sires in pygmy hippopotamus. The most plausible explanation for differentially skewed birth sex ratios in both species may be related to differences in social and reproductive systems. Whereas the polygynous, sexually dimorphic common hippopotamus biased the birth sex ratio towards males, the promiscuous and sexually monomorphic pygmy hippopotamus skewed the sex ratio in favour of females. Our results are in line with recent studies showing that not only manipulation by the mother (in common hippopotamus), but also by the father (in pygmy hippopotamus), may be responsible for the birth sex ratio in different species.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Biology Letters
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Biological Conservation
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Zoo Biology
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Mammal Review
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Journal of East African Natural History
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
MethodsX
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 28.57%
|
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 28.57%
|
|
|
The Royal Society
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
East African Natural History Society
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
1 publication, 14.29%
|
|
|
1
2
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Total citations:
7
Citations from 2024:
3
(42.86%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Pluháček J., Steck B. L. Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus // Ethology. 2015. Vol. 121. No. 5. pp. 462-471.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Pluháček J., Steck B. L. Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus // Ethology. 2015. Vol. 121. No. 5. pp. 462-471.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1111/eth.12357
UR - https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12357
TI - Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus
T2 - Ethology
AU - Pluháček, Jan
AU - Steck, Beatrice L
PY - 2015
DA - 2015/01/21
PB - Wiley
SP - 462-471
IS - 5
VL - 121
SN - 0179-1613
SN - 1439-0310
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2015_Pluháček,
author = {Jan Pluháček and Beatrice L Steck},
title = {Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus},
journal = {Ethology},
year = {2015},
volume = {121},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12357},
number = {5},
pages = {462--471},
doi = {10.1111/eth.12357}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Pluháček, Jan, et al. “Different Sex Allocations in Two Related Species: The Case of the Extant Hippopotamus.” Ethology, vol. 121, no. 5, Jan. 2015, pp. 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12357.