volume 35 issue 12 pages 2405-2410

Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter

Predrag Stojadinovic 1, 2
Nicoletta Ventrella 1, 3
Hana Alfredová 1
D Wichterle 1
PETR PEICHL 1
Robert Čihák 1
Vanda Filová Ing 4
Eva Borišincová 1
Petr Štiavnický 1
Jana Hašková 1
Janka Franeková 4
JOSEF KAUTZNER 1
1
 
Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czechia
4
 
Department of Biochemistry Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czechia
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-10-13
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR1.187
CiteScore5.0
Impact factor2.6
ISSN10453873, 15408167
PubMed ID:  39400487
Abstract
Introduction

Pulsed electric field (PEF) has emerged as a promising energy source for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data regarding the in‐vivo effect of PEF energy on erythrocytes during AF ablation procedures are scarce. This study aimed to quantify the impact of PEF energy on erythrocyte damage during AF ablation by assessing specific hemolytic biomarkers.

Methods

A total of 60 patients (age: 68 years, males: 72%, serum creatinine: 91 µmol/L) with AF underwent catheter ablation of AF using PEF energy delivered by a multipolar pentaspline Farawave catheter (Farapulse, Boston Scientific, Inc.). Ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation was performed at the operator's discretion. Peripheral venous blood was sampled for assessing the plasma levels of free hemoglobin (fHb), direct (conjugated) bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatinine before, immediately after the ablation, and on the next day.

Results

Following the PEF ablation with duration of [median (interquartile range)] 75 (58, 95) min, with 74 (52, 92) applications and PVI only in 27% of patients, fHb, LDH, and direct bilirubin significantly increased, from 40 (18, 65) to 493 (327, 848) mg/L, from 3.1 (2.6, 3.6) to 6.8 (5.0, 7.9) µkat/L, and from 12 (9, 17) to 28 (16, 44) µmol/L, respectively (all p < .0001). A strong linear correlation was found between the peak fHb and the number of PEF applications (R = 0.81, p < .001). The major hemolysis (defined as fHb >500 mg/L) was predicted by the number of PEF applications with the corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.934. The optimum cut‐off value of >74 PEF applications predicted the major hemolysis with 89% sensitivity and 87% specificity.

Conclusion

Catheter ablation of AF using PEF energy delivered from a pentaspline catheter is associated with significant intravascular hemolysis. More than 74 PEF applications frequently resulted in major hemolysis. However, the critical amount of PEF energy that may cause kidney injury in susceptible patients remains to be investigated.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Heart Rhythm
4 publications, 20%
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
3 publications, 15%
Heart Rhythm O2
3 publications, 15%
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
3 publications, 15%
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 5%
Biomedicines
1 publication, 5%
American Heart Journal
1 publication, 5%
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
1 publication, 5%
Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Review
1 publication, 5%
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
1 publication, 5%
PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
1 publication, 5%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Elsevier
8 publications, 40%
Wiley
4 publications, 20%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 20%
MDPI
1 publication, 5%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 5%
Radcliffe Media Media Ltd
1 publication, 5%
IMR Press
1 publication, 5%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
20
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Stojadinovic P. et al. Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter // Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2024. Vol. 35. No. 12. pp. 2405-2410.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Stojadinovic P., Ventrella N., Alfredová H., Wichterle D., PEICHL P., Čihák R., Ing V. F., Borišincová E., Štiavnický P., Hašková J., Franeková J., KAUTZNER J. Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter // Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2024. Vol. 35. No. 12. pp. 2405-2410.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1111/jce.16468
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16468
TI - Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter
T2 - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
AU - Stojadinovic, Predrag
AU - Ventrella, Nicoletta
AU - Alfredová, Hana
AU - Wichterle, D
AU - PEICHL, PETR
AU - Čihák, Robert
AU - Ing, Vanda Filová
AU - Borišincová, Eva
AU - Štiavnický, Petr
AU - Hašková, Jana
AU - Franeková, Janka
AU - KAUTZNER, JOSEF
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/10/13
PB - Wiley
SP - 2405-2410
IS - 12
VL - 35
PMID - 39400487
SN - 1045-3873
SN - 1540-8167
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Stojadinovic,
author = {Predrag Stojadinovic and Nicoletta Ventrella and Hana Alfredová and D Wichterle and PETR PEICHL and Robert Čihák and Vanda Filová Ing and Eva Borišincová and Petr Štiavnický and Jana Hašková and Janka Franeková and JOSEF KAUTZNER},
title = {Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter},
journal = {Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology},
year = {2024},
volume = {35},
publisher = {Wiley},
month = {oct},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16468},
number = {12},
pages = {2405--2410},
doi = {10.1111/jce.16468}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Stojadinovic, Predrag, et al. “Prediction of major intravascular hemolysis during pulsed electric field ablation of atrial fibrillation using a pentaspline catheter.” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 35, no. 12, Oct. 2024, pp. 2405-2410. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jce.16468.