Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, volume 9, issue 3, pages e12325

Sub‐epithelial connective tissue graft for the management of Miller's class I and class II isolated gingival recession defect: A systematic review of the factors influencing the outcome

Anisha P Yadav 1
Anita Kulloli 1
Sharath Shetty 1
Shruti S Ligade 1
Santosh S Martande 1
Meenakshi J Gholkar 1
1
 
Department of PeriodontologyDr. D Y Patil Dental CollegeDr. D Y Patil Vidyapeeth Pimpri, Pune Maharashtra India
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2018-02-09
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN20411618, 20411626
PubMed ID:  29424485
General Medicine
Abstract
The aim of the present systematic review was to analyze the factors that affect the outcome of subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for managing Miller's class I and class II isolated gingival recession defect. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for systematic reviews were used. Quality assessments of selected articles were performed. Data on root surface condition, recession type defect, flap thickness, different flap designs, different harvesting techniques, presence/absence of the epithelial collar, graft thickness, flap tension, suturing techniques, and smoking-related outcomes on root coverage were assessed. The SCTG procedure provides the best root coverage outcomes for Miller's class I and class II recession. The critical threshold of flap thickness was found to be 1 mm. Maximum root coverage was achieved by envelope and modified tunnel technique. SCTG with the epithelial collar does not provide additional gains than SCTG without the epithelial collar. The thickness of SCTG for root coverage was found to be 1.5-2 mm. Greater flap tension and smoking adversely affect root coverage outcomes. Analysis of the factors discussed would be of key importance for technique selection, and a combined approach involving factors favoring outcomes of SCTG could be of clinical relevance in recession coverage.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?