Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
Timothy H. Barker
1
,
Jennifer M. Stone
1
,
K. Sears
2
,
Miloslav Klugar
3
,
J Leonardi-Bee
4
,
Catalin Tufanaru
1, 5
,
1
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-09-19
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.061
CiteScore: 4.2
Impact factor: 4.5
ISSN: 26898381
PubMed ID:
36121230
General Nursing
Abstract
JBI offer a suite of critical appraisal instruments that are freely available to systematic reviewers and researchers investigating the methodological limitations of primary research studies. The JBI instruments are designed to be study-specific and are presented as questions in a checklist. The JBI instruments have existed in a checklist-style format for approximately 20 years; however, as the field of research synthesis expands, many of the tools offered by JBI have become outdated. The JBI critical appraisal tools for quantitative studies (eg, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies) must be updated to reflect the current methodologies in this field. Cognizant of this and the recent developments in risk-of-bias science, the JBI Effectiveness Methods Group was tasked with updating the current quantitative critical appraisal instruments. This paper details the methods and rationale that the JBI Effectiveness Methods Group followed when updating the JBI critical appraisal instruments for quantitative study designs. We detail the key changes made to the tools and highlight how these changes reflect current methodological developments in this field.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
|
|
JBI Evidence Synthesis
11 publications, 4.42%
|
|
|
Cureus
7 publications, 2.81%
|
|
|
Healthcare
5 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
BMJ Open
5 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
Systematic Reviews
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
|
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
|
HRB Open Research
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
BMC Oral Health
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
3 publications, 1.2%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
BMC Public Health
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
BMC Medical Education
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Adolescent Research Review
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Trauma, Violence, and Abuse
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Survey of Ophthalmology
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
International Journal of Dermatology
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Educational Research Review
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
International Journal of Nursing Studies
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
Supportive Care in Cancer
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
JMIR Research Protocols
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
BMC Medicine
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Health Science Reports
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Medicine (United States)
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
International Journal of Health Promotion and Education
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
|
Publishers
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
Springer Nature
68 publications, 27.31%
|
|
|
Elsevier
46 publications, 18.47%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
21 publications, 8.43%
|
|
|
Wiley
18 publications, 7.23%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
16 publications, 6.43%
|
|
|
MDPI
15 publications, 6.02%
|
|
|
SAGE
11 publications, 4.42%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
8 publications, 3.21%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
6 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
BMJ
6 publications, 2.41%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 2.01%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
4 publications, 1.61%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
IGI Global
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
SciELO
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
2 publications, 0.8%
|
|
|
PAGEPress Publications
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Bristol University Press
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Mary Ann Liebert
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Moffitt Cancer Center
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
ifmbe proceedings
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
S. Karger AG
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 0.4%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
249
Total citations:
249
Citations from 2024:
229
(91.96%)
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Barker T. H. et al. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process // JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022. Vol. Publish Ahead of Print. No. 3.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Barker T. H., Stone J. M., Sears K., Klugar M., Leonardi-Bee J., Tufanaru C., Aromataris E., Munn Z. Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process // JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2022. Vol. Publish Ahead of Print. No. 3.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.11124/jbies-22-00125
UR - https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00125
TI - Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
T2 - JBI Evidence Synthesis
AU - Barker, Timothy H.
AU - Stone, Jennifer M.
AU - Sears, K.
AU - Klugar, Miloslav
AU - Leonardi-Bee, J
AU - Tufanaru, Catalin
AU - Aromataris, Edoardo
AU - Munn, Zachary
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/09/19
PB - Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
IS - 3
VL - Publish Ahead of Print
PMID - 36121230
SN - 2689-8381
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_Barker,
author = {Timothy H. Barker and Jennifer M. Stone and K. Sears and Miloslav Klugar and J Leonardi-Bee and Catalin Tufanaru and Edoardo Aromataris and Zachary Munn},
title = {Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process},
journal = {JBI Evidence Synthesis},
year = {2022},
volume = {Publish Ahead of Print},
publisher = {Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-22-00125},
number = {3},
doi = {10.11124/jbies-22-00125}
}
Profiles