Science and the legal rights of nature
We review the use of science by lawmakers and courts in implementing or rejecting legal rights for nature in Ecuador, India, the United States, and other jurisdictions where some type of rights of nature have been recognized in the legal system. We then use the “right to evolve” to exemplify how interdisciplinary work can (i) help courts effectively define what this right might entail; (ii) inform how it might be applied in different circumstances; and (iii) provide a template for how scientists and legal scholars can generate the interdisciplinary scholarship necessary to understand and implement the growing body of rights-of-nature laws, and environmental law more generally. We conclude by pointing to what further research is needed to understand and effectively implement the growing body of rights-of-nature laws.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Water International
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
People and Nature
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
PNAS Nexus
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
RaumFragen: Stadt – Region – Landschaft
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Polar Journal
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Journal of Geography
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Cell Reports Sustainability
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Business Strategy and the Environment
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 30%
|
|
|
Wiley
2 publications, 20%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 20%
|
|
|
The Royal Society
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 10%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.