Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation
L.N. Kornilova
1
,
D O Glukhikh
1
,
I.A. NAUMOV
1
,
E V Habarova
1
,
G A Ekimovskiy
1
,
A S Pavlova
1
,
I.B. Kozlovskaya
1
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2016-09-01
scimago Q4
SJR: 0.168
CiteScore: 0.8
Impact factor: —
ISSN: 03621197, 16083164
Physiology
Physiology (medical)
Abstract
The effects of additional dynamic visual stimuli (retinal optokinetic stimulation (ROKS)) on the visual–manual tracking (VMT) indicators in the absence of support afferentation and with a reduced level of proprioceptive afferentation were determined using a model of horizontal “dry” immersion. The accuracy of the VMT of jerky and smooth (linear, pendular, and circular) movements represented by visual dot stimuli was evaluated in all 18 participants aged 19–31 before, during and after their exposure to a five- to seven-day immersion bath. The eye movements were recorded by electrooculography, while the hand movements were recorded by a joystick with a biological visual feedback (the current angle of the joystick handle was imaged on the screen). Computerized visual stimulation tests were presented, through virtual reality glasses, to subjects in the absence and against the background ROKS. We analyzed the temporal and the amplitude- and velocity-related visual and manual tracking (VT and MT) characteristics, including the efficiency (e) and gain (g) coefficients as the ratios between the amplitudes and velocities of eye/hand movements and the amplitude of stimulus movements. The efficiency and gain coefficients of both VT and MT without ROKS were significantly decreased against the baseline during the entire period including three days of immersion and 3 post-immersion days. The most pronounced worsening was observed in the VT parameters. Whereas the VT and MT parameters remained unchanged against the threshold ROKS before the immersion, they were improved during and after the immersion (the improvement was significant on the fifth to seventh day of immersion and on the thirdthird post-immersion day, compared to the test indicators on the clean screen). The most pronounced impact of ROKS was observed in the VT parameters. The vestibular function (VF) was evaluated by videooculography before and after immersion. We analyzed the static torsional otolith-cervicalocular reflex (OCOR), dynamic vestibular-cervical-ocular reactions (VCOR), vestibular reactivity (VR), and spontaneous eye movements (SpEM). A significant decrease in OCOR (gOCOR was 0.1, compared to the background gOCOR value of 0.25) was detected alongside a simultaneous significant increase in the VCOR/VR parameters in 28% of subjects on day R + 1 after immersion. Correlational has been found between the parameters of VT and MT, as well as between those of VF and VT, but no correlation has been found between the VF and MT characteristics. The results have shown that the removal of support afferentation and the minimization of proprioceptive afferentation more affected the accuracy of VT rather than that of MT. The correlational links between the studied parameters against the background of ROKS were not only preserved, but also intensified. The obtained results confirm the development of sensory deprivation (and afferent deficit) under the exposure to an immersion bath and indicate the approach to correcting the sensory deprivation through additional ROKS.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Frontiers in Physiology
3 publications, 60%
|
|
|
Life Sciences in Space Research
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
Acta Astronautica
1 publication, 20%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 60%
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 40%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
5
Total citations:
5
Citations from 2024:
0
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex |
MLA
Cite this
GOST
Copy
Kornilova L. et al. Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation // Human Physiology. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 5. pp. 508-519.
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
Kornilova L., Glukhikh D. O., NAUMOV I., Habarova E. V., Ekimovskiy G. A., Pavlova A. S., Kozlovskaya I. Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation // Human Physiology. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 5. pp. 508-519.
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1134/S0362119716040071
UR - https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119716040071
TI - Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation
T2 - Human Physiology
AU - Kornilova, L.N.
AU - Glukhikh, D O
AU - NAUMOV, I.A.
AU - Habarova, E V
AU - Ekimovskiy, G A
AU - Pavlova, A S
AU - Kozlovskaya, I.B.
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/09/01
PB - Pleiades Publishing
SP - 508-519
IS - 5
VL - 42
SN - 0362-1197
SN - 1608-3164
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2016_Kornilova,
author = {L.N. Kornilova and D O Glukhikh and I.A. NAUMOV and E V Habarova and G A Ekimovskiy and A S Pavlova and I.B. Kozlovskaya},
title = {Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation},
journal = {Human Physiology},
year = {2016},
volume = {42},
publisher = {Pleiades Publishing},
month = {sep},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119716040071},
number = {5},
pages = {508--519},
doi = {10.1134/S0362119716040071}
}
Cite this
MLA
Copy
Kornilova, L.N., et al. “Effect of optokinetic stimulation on visual–manual tracking under the conditions of support-proprioceptive deprivation.” Human Physiology, vol. 42, no. 5, Sep. 2016, pp. 508-519. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119716040071.
Profiles