EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update
Objectives
To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.
Methods
An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.
Results
The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3–6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.
Conclusions
These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.
Top-30
Journals
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
|
|
Rheumatology
67 publications, 6.01%
|
|
|
RMD Open
51 publications, 4.58%
|
|
|
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
44 publications, 3.95%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
38 publications, 3.41%
|
|
|
Clinical Rheumatology
32 publications, 2.87%
|
|
|
Rheumatology and Therapy
31 publications, 2.78%
|
|
|
International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases
27 publications, 2.42%
|
|
|
Modern Rheumatology
26 publications, 2.33%
|
|
|
Arthritis Research and Therapy
22 publications, 1.97%
|
|
|
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
19 publications, 1.71%
|
|
|
BMC Rheumatology
18 publications, 1.62%
|
|
|
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
16 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
16 publications, 1.44%
|
|
|
Rheumatology International
15 publications, 1.35%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Immunology
15 publications, 1.35%
|
|
|
Autoimmunity Reviews
14 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
Cureus
14 publications, 1.26%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Medicine
13 publications, 1.17%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Pharmacology
12 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
The Lancet Rheumatology
12 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Joint Bone Spine
12 publications, 1.08%
|
|
|
Revue du Rhumatisme (Edition Francaise)
10 publications, 0.9%
|
|
|
Biomedicines
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Arthritis and Rheumatology
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Nature reviews. Rheumatology
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
|
Reumatologia Clinica
7 publications, 0.63%
|
|
|
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
|
Publishers
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
|
|
Springer Nature
267 publications, 23.97%
|
|
|
Elsevier
236 publications, 21.18%
|
|
|
MDPI
121 publications, 10.86%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
99 publications, 8.89%
|
|
|
Wiley
97 publications, 8.71%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
70 publications, 6.28%
|
|
|
BMJ
63 publications, 5.66%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
48 publications, 4.31%
|
|
|
SAGE
23 publications, 2.06%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
13 publications, 1.17%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
13 publications, 1.17%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
9 publications, 0.81%
|
|
|
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
8 publications, 0.72%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
6 publications, 0.54%
|
|
|
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
|
Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
4 publications, 0.36%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
Korean College of Rheumatology
3 publications, 0.27%
|
|
|
PeerJ
2 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
American Chemical Society (ACS)
2 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
2 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
American Thoracic Society
2 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
AME Publishing Company
2 publications, 0.18%
|
|
|
World Scientific
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
XMLink
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
Hindawi Limited
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
OAE Publishing Inc.
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
Pensoft Publishers
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
Tsinghua University Press
1 publication, 0.09%
|
|
|
50
100
150
200
250
300
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.