BMJ, pages l4898

RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

Jeff Land 1, 2
Jelena Savović 1, 3
Matthew J. Page 4
Roy G. Elbers 1
Natalie S. Blencowe 1, 2
Isabelle Boutron 5, 6, 7
Christopher J Cates 8
Hung-Yuan Cheng 1, 2
Mark S Corbett 9
Sandra M Eldridge 10
Jonathan R. Emberson 11
Miguel A. Hernán 12
Sally Hopewell 13
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson 14, 15, 16
Daniela R. Junqueira 17
Peter Jüni 18
Jamie J Kirkham 19
Toby Lasserson 20
Tianjing Li 21
Alexandra McAleenan 1
Barnaby C. Reeves 2, 22
Sasha Shepperd 23
Ian Shrier 24
Lesley A Stewart 9
Kate Tilling 1, 2, 25
Ian R. White 26
Penny F Whiting 1, 3
Julian P.T. Higgins 1, 2, 3
Show full list: 28 authors
2
 
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
7
 
Cochrane France, Paris, France
20
 
Editorial and Methods Department, Cochrane Central Executive, London, UK
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2019-08-28
BMJ
BMJ
Journal: BMJ
scimago Q1
SJR2.803
CiteScore19.9
Impact factor93.6
ISSN09598146, 17561833, 09598138, 14685833, 00071447
General Engineering
Abstract

Assessment of risk of bias is regarded as an essential component of a systematic review on the effects of an intervention. The most commonly used tool for randomised trials is the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We updated the tool to respond to developments in understanding how bias arises in randomised trials, and to address user feedback on and limitations of the original tool.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450

Publishers

500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?