Evaluating access to health and care services during lockdown by the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies
Objective
Access to health services and adequate care is influenced by sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic position (SEP) and the burden of comorbidities. Our study aimed to assess whether the COVID-19 pandemic further deepened these already existing health inequalities.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Data were collected from five longitudinal age-homogenous British cohorts (born in 2000-2002, 1989-1990, 1970, 1958 and 1946).
Participants
A web survey was sent to the cohorts. Anybody who responded to the survey was included, resulting in 14 891 eligible participants.
Main outcomes measured
The survey provided data on cancelled surgical or medical appointments, and the number of care hours received in a week during the first UK COVID-19 national lockdown.
Interventions
Using binary or ordered logistic regression, we evaluated whether these outcomes differed by sex, ethnicity, SEP and having a chronic illness. Adjustment was made for study design, non-response weights, psychological distress, presence of children or adolescents in the household, COVID-19 infection, key worker status, and whether participants had received a shielding letter. Meta-analyses were performed across the cohorts, and meta-regression was used to evaluate the effect of age as a moderator.
Results
Women (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55) and those with a chronic illness (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.05) experienced significantly more cancellations during lockdown (all p<0.0001). Ethnic minorities and those with a chronic illness required a higher number of care hours during the lockdown (both OR≈2.00, all p<0.002). SEP was not associated with cancellation or care hours. Age was not independently associated with either outcome in the meta-regression.
Conclusion
The UK government’s lockdown approach during the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have deepened existing health inequalities, impacting predominantly women, ethnic minorities and those with chronic illnesses. Public health authorities need to implement urgent policies to ensure equitable access to health and care for all in preparation for a fourthwave.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
|
|
BMC Health Services Research
5 publications, 7.25%
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
4 publications, 5.8%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
Economics and Human Biology
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
BMC Public Health
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
Communication Monographs
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
HRB Open Research
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Internet Research
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
British Journal of Psychiatry
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Inquiry (United States)
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Healthcare
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Frontiers in Public Health
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Vaccines
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journal of Personalized Medicine
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journal of Medical Virology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Revista Clínica Española (English Edition)
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Health Communication
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Revista Clinica Espanola
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
BMJ Open
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
JAMA Health Forum
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Current Psychology
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
|
Publishers
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
|
|
Elsevier
16 publications, 23.19%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
13 publications, 18.84%
|
|
|
MDPI
9 publications, 13.04%
|
|
|
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 7.25%
|
|
|
Oxford University Press
4 publications, 5.8%
|
|
|
Taylor & Francis
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
|
Wiley
3 publications, 4.35%
|
|
|
SAGE
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
Frontiers Media S.A.
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
BMJ
2 publications, 2.9%
|
|
|
F1000 Research
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
JMIR Publications
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
PeerJ
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Royal College of Psychiatrists
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
American Medical Association (AMA)
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Emerald
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
Cambridge University Press
1 publication, 1.45%
|
|
|
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.