Trackability of distal access catheters: an in vitro quantitative evaluation of navigation strategies
Background
In mechanical thrombectomy (MT), distal access catheters (DACs) are tracked through the vascular anatomy to reach the occlusion site. The inability of DACs to reach the occlusion site has been reported as a predictor of unsuccessful recanalization. This study aims to provide insight into how to navigate devices through the vascular anatomy with minimal track forces, since higher forces may imply more risk of vascular injuries.
Methods
We designed an experimental setup to monitor DAC track forces when navigating through an in vitro anatomical model. Experiments were recorded to study mechanical behaviors such as tension buildup against vessel walls, DAC buckling, and abrupt advancements. A multiple regression analysis was performed to predict track forces from the catheters’ design specifications.
Results
DACs were successfully delivered to the target M1 in 60 of 63 in vitro experiments (95.2%). Compared to navigation with unsupported DAC, the concomitant coaxial use of a microcatheter/microguidewire and microcatheter/stent retriever anchoring significantly reduced the track forces by about 63% and 77%, respectively (p<0.01). The presence of the braid pattern in the reinforcement significantly reduced the track forces regardless of the technique used (p<0.05). Combined coil and braid reinforcement configuration, as compared with coil alone, and a thinner distal wall were predictors of lower track force when navigating with unsupported DAC.
Conclusions
The use of microcatheter and stent retriever facilitate smooth navigation of DACs through the vascular tortuosity to reach the occlusion site, which in turn improves the reliability of tracking when positioning the DAC closer to the thrombus interface.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
|
|
|
Neurointervention
2 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
World Neurosurgery
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Interventional Neuroradiology
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Neuroradiology
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Clinical Neuroradiology
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
|
1
2
|
|
|
Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology
2 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 25%
|
|
|
BMJ
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Elsevier
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
1
2
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.