Tobacco Control, pages tc-2023-058483

Cigarette smoking decline among US young adults from 2000 to 2019, in relation to state-level cigarette price and tobacco control expenditure

Karen Messer 1, 2
John Pierce 1, 2
Jiayu Chen 3, 4
Man Luo 3, 4
Matthew D Stone 5, 6
Eric C. Leas 5, 6
Yuyan Shi 5, 6
David R. Strong 5, 6
Dennis R. Trinidad 5, 6
Sara B. McMenamin 5, 6
Show full list: 10 authors
2
 
Univeristy of California
3
 
Division of Biostatistics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health
4
 
University Of California
5
 
Herbert Werthiem School of Public Health
6
 
Univeristy of Califronia
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-07-09
BMJ
BMJ
Journal: Tobacco Control
scimago Q1
SJR1.654
CiteScore9.1
Impact factor4
ISSN09644563, 14683318
Abstract
Objective

To investigate the association of state-level cigarette price and tobacco control expenditure with the large 2000–2019 decline in cigarette smoking among US 18–24 year-olds.

Methods

Smoking behaviour was assessed in the 24 most populous US states using the 1992–2019 Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey; association with price and expenditure was tested using adjusted logistic regression. States were ranked by inflation-adjusted average price and tobacco control expenditure and grouped into tertiles. State-specific time trends were estimated, with slope changes in 2001/2002 and 2010/2011.

Results

Between 2000 and 2010, the odds of smoking among US young adults decreased by a third (adjusted OR, AOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.84). By 2019, these odds were one-quarter of their 2000 level (AOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.31). Among states in the lowest tertile of price/expenditure tobacco control activity, initially higher young adult smoking decreased by 13 percentage points from 2010 to 2018–2019, to a prevalence of 5.6% (95% CI 4.5% to 6.8%), equal to that in the highest tobacco-control tertile of states (6.5%, 95% CI 5.2% to 7.8%). Neither state tobacco control spending (AOR 1.0, 95% CI 0.999 to 1.002) nor cigarette price (AOR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.01) were associated with young adult smoking in statistical models. In 2019, seven states had prevalence over 3 SDs higher than the 24-state mean.

Conclusion

National programmes may have filled a gap in state-level interventions, helping drive down the social acceptability of cigarette smoking among young adults across all states. Additional interventions are needed to assist high-prevalence states to further reduce smoking.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?