volume 28 issue 5 pages 465-471

Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality

Veronica A Pear 1, 2
Rocco Pallin 1, 2
Julia P Schleimer 1, 2
Elizabeth Tomsich 1, 2
Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz 1, 2
Aaron B. Shev 1, 2
Christopher E. Knoepke 3, 4, 5, 6
Garen J. Wintemute 1, 2
1
 
Department of Emergency Medicine
3
 
Adult and Child Consortium for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science
5
 
Division of Cardiology
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2022-06-02
scimago Q2
wos Q3
SJR0.878
CiteScore5.7
Impact factor2.0
ISSN13538047, 14755785
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract
Background

Gun violence restraining orders (GVROs), implemented in California in 2016, temporarily prohibit individuals at high risk of violence from purchasing or possessing firearms and ammunition. We sought to describe the circumstances giving rise to GVROs issued 2016–2018, provide details about the GVRO process and quantify mortality outcomes for individuals subject to these orders (‘respondents’).

Methods

For this cross-sectional description of GVRO respondents, 2016–2018, we abstracted case details from court files and used LexisNexis to link respondents to mortality data through August 2020.

Results

We abstracted information for 201 respondents with accessible court records. Respondents were mostly white (61.2%) and men (93.5%). Fifty-four per cent of cases involved potential harm to others alone, 15.3% involved potential harm to self alone and 25.2% involved both. Mass shooting threats occurred in 28.7% of cases. Ninety-six and one half per cent of petitioners were law enforcement officers and one-in-three cases resulted in arrest on order service. One-year orders after a hearing (following 21-day emergency/temporary orders) were issued in 53.5% of cases. Most (84.2%) respondents owned at least one firearm, and firearms were removed in 55.9% of cases. Of the 379 respondents matched by LexisNexis, 7 (1.8%) died after the GVRO was issued: one from a self-inflicted firearm injury that was itself the reason for the GVRO and the others from causes unrelated to violence.

Conclusions

GVROs were used most often by law enforcement officers to prevent firearm assault/homicide and post-GVRO firearm fatalities among respondents were rare. Future studies should investigate additional respondent outcomes and potential sources of heterogeneity.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Injury Epidemiology
3 publications, 13.64%
Preventive Medicine
3 publications, 13.64%
Inquiry (United States)
3 publications, 13.64%
JAMA network open
2 publications, 9.09%
BMC Public Health
1 publication, 4.55%
Research square
1 publication, 4.55%
Psychological Reports
1 publication, 4.55%
Preventive Medicine Reports
1 publication, 4.55%
Health Services Insights
1 publication, 4.55%
Annual Review of Criminology
1 publication, 4.55%
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
1 publication, 4.55%
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
1 publication, 4.55%
Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
1 publication, 4.55%
JAMA Surgery
1 publication, 4.55%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Elsevier
7 publications, 31.82%
SAGE
6 publications, 27.27%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 18.18%
American Medical Association (AMA)
3 publications, 13.64%
Annual Reviews
1 publication, 4.55%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
22
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Pear V. A. et al. Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality // Injury Prevention. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 5. pp. 465-471.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Pear V. A., Pallin R., Schleimer J. P., Tomsich E., Kravitz-Wirtz N., Shev A. B., Knoepke C. E., Wintemute G. J. Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality // Injury Prevention. 2022. Vol. 28. No. 5. pp. 465-471.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544
UR - https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544
TI - Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality
T2 - Injury Prevention
AU - Pear, Veronica A
AU - Pallin, Rocco
AU - Schleimer, Julia P
AU - Tomsich, Elizabeth
AU - Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole
AU - Shev, Aaron B.
AU - Knoepke, Christopher E.
AU - Wintemute, Garen J.
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/06/02
PB - BMJ
SP - 465-471
IS - 5
VL - 28
PMID - 35654574
SN - 1353-8047
SN - 1475-5785
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2022_Pear,
author = {Veronica A Pear and Rocco Pallin and Julia P Schleimer and Elizabeth Tomsich and Nicole Kravitz-Wirtz and Aaron B. Shev and Christopher E. Knoepke and Garen J. Wintemute},
title = {Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality},
journal = {Injury Prevention},
year = {2022},
volume = {28},
publisher = {BMJ},
month = {jun},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544},
number = {5},
pages = {465--471},
doi = {10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Pear, Veronica A., et al. “Gun violence restraining orders in California, 2016–2018: case details and respondent mortality.” Injury Prevention, vol. 28, no. 5, Jun. 2022, pp. 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2022-044544.