Publication type: Proceedings Article
Publication date: 2013-04-21
Abstract
Massive data centers housing thousands of computing nodes have become commonplace in enterprise computing, and the power consumption of such data centers is growing at an unprecedented rate. Adding to the problem is the inability of the servers to exhibit energy proportionality, i.e., provide energy-efficient execution under all levels of utilization, which diminishes the overall energy efficiency of the data center. It is imperative that we realize effective strategies to control the power consumption of the server and improve the energy efficiency of data centers. With the advent of Intel Sandy Bridge processors, we have the ability to specify a limit on power consumption during runtime, which creates opportunities to design new power-management techniques for enterprise workloads and make the systems that they run on more energy proportional.In this paper, we investigate whether it is possible to achieve energy proportionality for an enterprise-class server workload, namely SPECpower_ssj2008 benchmark, by using Intel's Running Average Power Limit (RAPL) interfaces. First, we analyze the power consumption and characterize the instantaneous power profile of the SPECpower benchmark within different subsystems using the on-chip energy meters exposed via the RAPL interfaces. We then analyze the impact of RAPL power limiting on the performance, per-transaction response time, power consumption, and energy efficiency of the benchmark under different load levels. Our observations and results shed light on the efficacy of the RAPL interfaces and provide guidance for designing power-management techniques for enterprise-class workloads.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
3 publications, 10%
|
|
|
ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
ACM SIGPLAN Notices
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
Sensors
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
|
|
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
6 publications, 20%
|
|
|
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
3 publications, 10%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
3 publications, 10%
|
|
|
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 3.33%
|
|
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
30
Total citations:
30
Citations from 2024:
0