volume 2014 pages 1-4

Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies

Juliana Sayuri Kubotani 1
Antonio Fernandes Moron 1
Antonio Fernandes Moron 1
Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti 1
Vanessa Cardoso Marques Soares 1
Julio Elito Júnior 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2014-03-27
SJR
CiteScore
Impact factor
ISSN20904436, 20904444
PubMed ID:  25006476
General Medicine
Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare perineal distensibility between women with twin and singleton pregnancies and to correlate these women’s perineal distensibility with anthropometric data. This prospective cross-sectional case-control study was conducted among nulliparous women, of whom 20 were pregnant with twins and 23 with a single fetus. Perineal distensibility was evaluated in the third trimester by means of Epi-no, which was introduced into the vagina and inflated up to the maximum tolerable limit. It was then withdrawn while inflated and its circumference was measured. The unpaired Student’s t-test was used to compare perineal distensibility in the two groups and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to correlate the pregnant women’s perineal distensibility with their anthropometric data. There was no difference in perineal distensibility between the twin group (16.51 ± 2.05 cm) and singleton group (16.13 ± 1.67 cm) (P=0.50). There was a positive correlation between perineal distensibility and abdominal circumference (r=0.36; P=0.01). The greater the abdominal circumference was, the greater the perineal distensibility was, regardless of whether the pregnancy was twin or singleton.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
2 publications, 28.57%
International Urogynecology Journal
1 publication, 14.29%
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
1 publication, 14.29%
Physical Therapy
1 publication, 14.29%
Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
Springer Nature
2 publications, 28.57%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 28.57%
Associacao Paulista de Medicina
1 publication, 14.29%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 14.29%
1
2
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
7
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Kubotani J. S. et al. Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies // ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014. Vol. 2014. pp. 1-4.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Kubotani J. S., Moron A. F., Moron A. F., Zanetti M. R. D., Soares V. C. M., Elito Júnior J. Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies // ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014. Vol. 2014. pp. 1-4.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1155/2014/124206
UR - https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/124206
TI - Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies
T2 - ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
AU - Kubotani, Juliana Sayuri
AU - Moron, Antonio Fernandes
AU - Moron, Antonio Fernandes
AU - Zanetti, Miriam Raquel Diniz
AU - Soares, Vanessa Cardoso Marques
AU - Elito Júnior, Julio
PY - 2014
DA - 2014/03/27
PB - Hindawi Limited
SP - 1-4
VL - 2014
PMID - 25006476
SN - 2090-4436
SN - 2090-4444
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2014_Kubotani,
author = {Juliana Sayuri Kubotani and Antonio Fernandes Moron and Antonio Fernandes Moron and Miriam Raquel Diniz Zanetti and Vanessa Cardoso Marques Soares and Julio Elito Júnior},
title = {Perineal Distensibility Using Epi-no in Twin Pregnancies: Comparative Study with Singleton Pregnancies},
journal = {ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology},
year = {2014},
volume = {2014},
publisher = {Hindawi Limited},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/124206},
pages = {1--4},
doi = {10.1155/2014/124206}
}