Open Access
Open access
Journal of Ophthalmology, volume 2025, issue 1

Refractive Accuracy of a Novel Swept‐Source OCT in Patients With Short and Long Eyes

Laureano A. Rementería-Capelo
Inés Contreras
Jorge L. García-Pérez
Javier Ruiz-Alcocer
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-20
scimago Q2
SJR0.719
CiteScore4.3
Impact factor1.8
ISSN2090004X, 20900058
Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the refractive accuracy of a novel swept‐source optical coherence biometer (SS‐OCT), that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length, in short and long eyes implanted with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods: This retrospective comparative study considered eyes with short axial length (AL) (< 22.5 mm) or long AL (> 26 mm) bilaterally implanted with the Acrysof IQ monofocal IOL. All eyes were preoperatively analyzed with the Argos biometer and IOL calculations were made using the Barrett Universal II (BUII). One month after the surgery, refractive and visual outcomes and refractive prediction errors were calculated. Furthermore, a back calculation of the prediction errors based on the Barrett True Axial Length (BTAL) formula was also performed and the results of both formulas were compared.

Results: Sixty eyes of 60 patients (30 with AL < 22.5 mm (short) and 30 with AL > 26 mm (long)) were included. After surgery, monocular UDVA was 0.03 ± 0.10 and 0.10 ± 0.15 logMAR for short‐eye and long‐eye groups, respectively. For short eyes, mean prediction error (MPE) with BUII and BTAL were 0.19 ± 0.34 D and 0.00 ± 0.35 D, respectively (p  <  0.001). Mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.32 ± 0.22 D with the BUII and 0.29 ± 0.20 D with the BTAL formula (p = 0.21). For long eyes, MPE with BUII was −0.15 ± 0.35 D and −0.13 ± 0.36 D with BTAL (p = 0.08), while MAE was 0.31 ± 0.21 D and 0.32 ± 0.20 D with BUII and BTAL, respectively (p = 0.33). The percentage of eyes with a prediction error within ±0.5 D predicted postop spherical equivalent was > 75% for both groups and both formulas (p > 0.05 for all situations).

Conclusions: The novel SS‐OCT biometer using individual refractive indices to measure AL showed an overall good refractive accuracy using the BUII. The results were similar or better with the optimized BTAL formula, suggesting that formulas purposely designed for biometric measurements with this novel technology are a promising tool for eyes with extreme AL.

  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?