Open Access
Open access
Network Neuroscience, volume 9, issue 1, pages 421-446

Validating MEG estimated resting state connectome with intracranial EEG

Afnan Jawata 1, 2, 3, 4
Zhengchen Cai 3
Jean-Marc Lina 5, 6, 7, 8
Chifaou Abdallah 1, 2, 3, 4, 9
G. Pellegrino 10
Giorgio Arcara 11
Hassan Khajehpour 9
B. Frauscher 9
Jean Gotman 3
C. Grova 1, 3, 5, 12
Show full list: 10 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-15
scimago Q1
SJR1.574
CiteScore6.4
Impact factor3.6
ISSN24721751
Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is widely used for studying resting-state brain connectivity. However, MEG source imaging is ill posed and has limited spatial resolution. This introduces source-leakage issues, making it challenging to interpret MEG-derived connectivity in resting states. To address this, we validated MEG-derived connectivity from 45 healthy participants using a normative intracranial EEG (iEEG) atlas. The MEG inverse problem was solved using the wavelet-maximum entropy on the mean method. We computed four connectivity metrics: amplitude envelope correlation (AEC), orthogonalized AEC (OAEC), phase locking value (PLV), and weighted-phase lag index (wPLI). We compared spatial correlation between MEG and iEEG connectomes across standard canonical frequency bands. We found moderate spatial correlations between MEG and iEEG connectomes for AEC and PLV. However, when considering metrics that correct/remove zero-lag connectivity (OAEC/wPLI), the spatial correlation between MEG and iEEG connectomes decreased. MEG exhibited higher zero-lag connectivity compared with iEEG. The correlations between MEG and iEEG connectomes suggest that relevant connectivity patterns can be recovered from MEG. However, since these correlations are moderate/low, MEG connectivity results should be interpreted with caution. Metrics that correct for zero-lag connectivity show decreased correlations, highlighting a trade-off; while MEG may capture more connectivity due to source-leakage, removing zero-lag connectivity can eliminate true connections.

Found 
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?