volume 29 issue 1 pages 63-84

In Defense of the History of Psychology

Gonzalo Salas 1
Rubén Ardila 2
Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela 3
Andrés M. Pérez-Acosta 4
Hugo Klappenbach 5, 6
Hernán Scholten 7
Ramón León 8
María Andrea Piñeda 5, 6
Julio Cesar Ossa 9
Fernando Ferrari 10
Walter Arias-Gallegos 11
Josiane Sueli Beria 5, 6
Fernando Andrés Polanco 5, 6
Rodolfo E. Mardones 12
Patricia Scherman 13, 14
Salvador I. Rodríguez Preciado 15
José Ramos-Vera 1
Juan David Millán 16
Jean Nikola Cudina 17
Miguel Barboza-Palomino 18
José E García 19
María Inés Winkler 20
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez 21
Miguel Gallegos 22, 23
Claudio López-Calle 24
Vanetza Quezada-Scholz 25
Roberto González 26
6
 
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, San Luis, Argentina
11
 
Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Perú
14
 
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Córdoba, Argentina
15
 
Sociedad Mexicana de Psicología Social, Guadalajara, México
19
 
Universidad Católica, Asunción, Paraguay
23
 
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-12-06
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.598
CiteScore8.2
Impact factor3.2
ISSN10892680, 19391552
Abstract

The main purpose is to provide a defense of the history of psychology at a global (worldwide); however, it is important to consider that this defense arises from Latin America. Given that this panorama is mostly unknown to a large part of psychologists, this article presents itself as an explicit action to foster this discipline by addressing three main issues. Firstly, present some milestones in the journey of the history of psychology at the global with an emphasis on Latin America. Secondly, present a series of critical reflections on the current relevance of this area within the field of psychology. Finally, establish a position in 10 sentences that acts as a defense of the importance of the history of psychology for the psychological discipline on various levels. While the majority of the content presented here is commonly recognized among individuals professionally immersed in historical research within the realm of psychology, it possesses a diminished level of accessibility for students and psychologists not specializing in historical matters. The aim here is not to convince those who are already convinced, but to have an impact beyond the community of specialists that, synergistically, can affect the vast field of psychology in general.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Salas G. et al. In Defense of the History of Psychology // Review of General Psychology. 2024. Vol. 29. No. 1. pp. 63-84.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Salas G., Ardila R., Jacó-Vilela A. M., Pérez-Acosta A. M., Klappenbach H., Scholten H., León R., Piñeda M. A., Ossa J. C., Ferrari F., Arias-Gallegos W., Beria J. S., Polanco F. A., Mardones R. E., Scherman P., Rodríguez Preciado S. I., Ramos-Vera J., Millán J. D., Cudina J. N., Barboza-Palomino M., García J. E., Winkler M. I., Caycho-Rodríguez T., Gallegos M., López-Calle C., Quezada-Scholz V., González R. In Defense of the History of Psychology // Review of General Psychology. 2024. Vol. 29. No. 1. pp. 63-84.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/10892680241306055
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10892680241306055
TI - In Defense of the History of Psychology
T2 - Review of General Psychology
AU - Salas, Gonzalo
AU - Ardila, Rubén
AU - Jacó-Vilela, Ana Maria
AU - Pérez-Acosta, Andrés M.
AU - Klappenbach, Hugo
AU - Scholten, Hernán
AU - León, Ramón
AU - Piñeda, María Andrea
AU - Ossa, Julio Cesar
AU - Ferrari, Fernando
AU - Arias-Gallegos, Walter
AU - Beria, Josiane Sueli
AU - Polanco, Fernando Andrés
AU - Mardones, Rodolfo E.
AU - Scherman, Patricia
AU - Rodríguez Preciado, Salvador I.
AU - Ramos-Vera, José
AU - Millán, Juan David
AU - Cudina, Jean Nikola
AU - Barboza-Palomino, Miguel
AU - García, José E
AU - Winkler, María Inés
AU - Caycho-Rodríguez, Tomás
AU - Gallegos, Miguel
AU - López-Calle, Claudio
AU - Quezada-Scholz, Vanetza
AU - González, Roberto
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/12/06
PB - SAGE
SP - 63-84
IS - 1
VL - 29
SN - 1089-2680
SN - 1939-1552
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Salas,
author = {Gonzalo Salas and Rubén Ardila and Ana Maria Jacó-Vilela and Andrés M. Pérez-Acosta and Hugo Klappenbach and Hernán Scholten and Ramón León and María Andrea Piñeda and Julio Cesar Ossa and Fernando Ferrari and Walter Arias-Gallegos and Josiane Sueli Beria and Fernando Andrés Polanco and Rodolfo E. Mardones and Patricia Scherman and Salvador I. Rodríguez Preciado and José Ramos-Vera and Juan David Millán and Jean Nikola Cudina and Miguel Barboza-Palomino and José E García and María Inés Winkler and Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez and Miguel Gallegos and Claudio López-Calle and Vanetza Quezada-Scholz and Roberto González},
title = {In Defense of the History of Psychology},
journal = {Review of General Psychology},
year = {2024},
volume = {29},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {dec},
url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10892680241306055},
number = {1},
pages = {63--84},
doi = {10.1177/10892680241306055}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Salas, Gonzalo, et al. “In Defense of the History of Psychology.” Review of General Psychology, vol. 29, no. 1, Dec. 2024, pp. 63-84. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10892680241306055.