Which recommendation system do you trust the most? Exploring the impact of perceived anthropomorphism on recommendation system trust, choice confidence, and information disclosure

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-01-23
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR2.400
CiteScore13.7
Impact factor4.3
ISSN14614448, 14617315
Sociology and Political Science
Communication
Abstract

Recommendation systems (RSs) leverage data and algorithms to generate a set of suggestions to reduce consumers’ efforts and assist their decisions. In this study, we examine how different framings of recommendations trigger people’s anthropomorphic perceptions of RSs and therefore affect users’ attitudes in an online experiment. Participants used and evaluated one of four versions of a web-based wine RS with different source framings (i.e. “recommendation by an algorithm,” “recommendation by an AI assistant,” “recommendation by knowledge generated from similar people,” no description). Results showed that different source framings generated different levels of perceived anthropomorphism. Participants indicated greater trust in the recommendations and greater confidence in making choices based on the recommendations when they perceived an RS as highly anthropomorphic; however, higher perceived anthropomorphism of an RS led to a lower willingness to disclose personal information to the RS.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases
1 publication, 11.11%
International Journal of Human Computer Studies
1 publication, 11.11%
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research
1 publication, 11.11%
Information Communication and Society
1 publication, 11.11%
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
1 publication, 11.11%
AI and Society
1 publication, 11.11%
Journal of Travel Research
1 publication, 11.11%
Enterprise Information Systems
1 publication, 11.11%
Quality and Quantity
1 publication, 11.11%
1

Publishers

1
2
SAGE
2 publications, 22.22%
Taylor & Francis
2 publications, 22.22%
Springer Nature
2 publications, 22.22%
Elsevier
1 publication, 11.11%
MDPI
1 publication, 11.11%
Emerald
1 publication, 11.11%
1
2
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
9
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Wang Y. (., Liu W., Yao M. Which recommendation system do you trust the most? Exploring the impact of perceived anthropomorphism on recommendation system trust, choice confidence, and information disclosure // New Media and Society. 2024.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Wang Y. (., Liu W., Yao M. Which recommendation system do you trust the most? Exploring the impact of perceived anthropomorphism on recommendation system trust, choice confidence, and information disclosure // New Media and Society. 2024.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/14614448231223517
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448231223517
TI - Which recommendation system do you trust the most? Exploring the impact of perceived anthropomorphism on recommendation system trust, choice confidence, and information disclosure
T2 - New Media and Society
AU - Wang, Yanyun (mia)
AU - Liu, Weizi
AU - Yao, Mike
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/01/23
PB - SAGE
SN - 1461-4448
SN - 1461-7315
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Wang,
author = {Yanyun (mia) Wang and Weizi Liu and Mike Yao},
title = {Which recommendation system do you trust the most? Exploring the impact of perceived anthropomorphism on recommendation system trust, choice confidence, and information disclosure},
journal = {New Media and Society},
year = {2024},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {jan},
url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448231223517},
doi = {10.1177/14614448231223517}
}