Open Access
Open access
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, volume 18

A simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to identify malignant pleural effusion

Shuyan Wang 1, 2
Jing An 1, 2
Xueru Hu 1, 2
Tingting Zeng 1, 2
Ping Li 1, 2
Jiangyue Qin 1, 2
Yong-chun Shen 3, 4
Tao Wang 3, 4
Fuqiang Wen 1, 2
Show full list: 9 authors
2
 
Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, Chengdu, China
4
 
Division of Pulmonary Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of China, No.1 Keyuan Fourth Road, Gaopeng Avenue, Chengdu, China
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-01-08
scimago Q1
SJR1.179
CiteScore6.9
Impact factor3.3
ISSN17534658, 17534666
Pharmacology (medical)
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Abstract
Background:

Early diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is of great significance. Current prediction models are not simple enough to be widely used in heavy clinical work.

Objectives:

We aimed to develop a simple and efficient clinical prediction scoring system to distinguish MPE from benign pleural effusion (BPE).

Design:

This retrospective study involved patients with MPE or BPE who were admitted in West China Hospital from December 2010 to September 2016.

Methods:

Patients were divided into training, testing, and validation set. Prediction model was developed from training set and modified to a scoring system. The diagnostic efficacy and clinical benefits of the scoring system were estimated in all three sets.

Results:

Finally, 598 cases of MPE and 1094 cases of BPE were included. Serum neuron-specific enolase, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), pleural carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and ratio of pleural CEA to serum CEA were selected to establish the prediction models in training set, which were modified to the scoring system with scores of 6, 8, 10, and 9 points, respectively. Patients with scores >12 points have high MPE risk while ⩽12 points have low MPE risk. The scoring system has a high predictive value and good clinical benefits to differentiate MPE from BPE or lung-specific MPE from BPE.

Conclusion:

This study developed a simple clinical prediction scoring system and was proven to have good clinical benefits, and it may help clinicians to separate MPE from BPE.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
1

Publishers

1
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?