Open Access
Open access
Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, volume 19

A real-world study to evaluate effectiveness of mepolizumab in treating severe asthma in Taiwan (REMIT)

Shih-Lung Cheng 1
Shu-Min Lin 2
Chung-Kan Peng 3
Ming-Cheng Chan 4
Sheng-Yeh Shen 5
Ping-Hung Kuo 6
Chien-Hao Lai 7
Chou-Chin Lan 8
Chung-Yu Chen 9
CHING-HSIUNG LIN 10
Kuang-Ming Liao 11
Po-Hao Feng 12
Jiin-Torng Wu 13
Yufeng Wei 14, 15
Xiaomeng Xu 16
Rafael Alfonso-Christancho 17
Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho 17
Tina Lai 18
Aldo Navarro 16
Dominique Milea 16
Diahn‐Warng Perng 19, 20
Show full list: 21 authors
1
 
Division of Pulmonology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
2
 
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
4
 
Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
7
 
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
8
 
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
10
 
Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
11
 
Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
12
 
Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
13
 
Cathay general hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
14
 
School of Medicine for International Students, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
15
 
Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
17
 
GSK, Philadelphia, PA, USA
18
 
GSK, Taipei, Taiwan
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-01-20
scimago Q1
SJR1.179
CiteScore6.9
Impact factor3.3
ISSN17534658, 17534666
Abstract
Background:

REMIT is the first real-world study of mepolizumab effectiveness in patients with severe asthma (SA) in Taiwan.

Objectives:

The primary objective evaluated changes in clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs; defined as use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) or emergency department (ED) visits and/or hospitalizations) in the 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment. Secondary objectives assessed changes in the number of CSEs requiring ED visits/hospitalizations and daily maintenance OCS (mOCS) dosage 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment. Three- and four-component clinical remissions were analyzed based on OCS-free, exacerbation-free, and asthma control (± stability in lung function).

Design:

REMIT was a retrospective, observational, self-controlled study analyzing patients in Taiwan with SA who were newly prescribed subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg Q4W.

Methods:

Data were extracted from records of 15 medical centers in Taiwan for patients indexed between November 1, 2018 and October 31, 2020.

Results:

A total of 170 patients were included: mean age at index date, 58.7 years; 53.5% female; 100% Chinese; 7.1% with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, 1.8% with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 1.2% with hypereosinophilic syndrome; and 55.7% with blood eosinophil count >300/µL. Pre-treatment, 71.2% had ⩾2 exacerbations, and 28.7% were on mOCS; 75.3% had no prior biologic treatment, and 24.7% had switched from other biologics. Most patients (80.0%) completed ⩾10 mepolizumab doses. Following the first mepolizumab administration (index date), CSEs reduced by 46.0% (rate ratio (RR): 0.545, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.418–0.710; p < 0.0001) in the 12 months post-index. Exacerbations requiring ED visits/hospitalization reduced by 46.9% (RR: 0.531, 95% CI: 0.349–0.808; p = 0.0031). Median mOCS dose reduced by 100% by end of study and 81.8% of patients discontinued mOCS post-treatment. After 1 year of mepolizumab treatment, 28% and 23% patients achieved three- and four-component clinical remission, respectively.

Conclusion:

Mepolizumab use in a patient population in Taiwan with SA significantly reduced CSEs and mOCS use in routine clinical practice.

Found 
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?