Emotion Review

Nostalgia for the Past, Present and Future

Saulius Geniusas 1
1
 
Department of Philosophy, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, NT, Hong Kong
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-27
Journal: Emotion Review
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR1.032
CiteScore6.6
Impact factor3
ISSN17540739, 17540747
Abstract

In my response to the three commentaries, I emphasize the importance of philosophical reflections on nostalgia, and especially those that are oriented phenomenologically. I criticize the methodological commitments that underlie the approach taken by Constantine Sedikides and Tim Wildschut as well as their contention that nostalgia for the past is the only legitimate form of nostalgia. I reflect on the importance of various implications that James Morley and Kathleen Higgins draw in their commentaries. I accept the view presented by the three critics that nostalgia can be lived not only as a negative, but also as a positive emotion, and provide some further reflections on how positive nostalgia can be spoken of as nostalgia for the past, present and future.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?