Navigating “Promising Victimhood:” Discretionary Practices of UNHCR Caseworkers in Rwanda’s Refugee Resettlement Process

Kine Marie Bækkevold 1, 2
Ingunn Bjørkhaug 2
Jerome Irankunda 3
Shai André Divon 1
2
 
Fafo Institute for Labor and Social Research
3
 
University of Tourism, Technology and Business Studies
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-12-19
scimago Q1
SJR1.093
CiteScore4.5
Impact factor
ISSN23315024, 23302488
Abstract

Executive Summary

As the global refugee population continues to expand, resettlement opportunities remain scarce, accessible only to a select few. Scholarly literature has increasingly drawn attention to the opaque bureaucratic processes, often referred to as “black boxes,” that govern resettlement selection, revealing that the decision-making practices determining which refugees are chosen for resettlement are still not well understood. This study addresses a critical gap concerning the implementation of selection criteria within UNHCR’s operations in the Global South, with a specific focus on caseworkers in Rwanda. It examines how these criteria are applied in practice, providing new empirical insights into the concept of “promising victimhood” — the contradictory demands placed on refugees to simultaneously demonstrate both vulnerability and integration potential to qualify for asylum or resettlement. The study explores how caseworkers navigate their roles amidst the complex and often conflicting demands imposed on refugees during the selection process. The analysis is grounded in interviews with sixteen caseworkers involved in resettlement selection, employing street-level bureaucracy theory alongside the concepts of refugee deservingness and promising victimhood. As key actors in the selection process, caseworkers exercise bottom-up power as policy implementers, while simultaneously adhering to the top-down directives established by resettlement states. The findings reveal that caseworkers employ a range of discretionary practices to reconcile the demands of resettlement states’ admission criteria with their advocacy for refugees deemed most vulnerable by the UNHCR. This research enhances our understanding of UNHCR’s operations at the street level, shedding light on how the practices of caseworkers influence perceptions of refugee eligibility and ultimately influence who is granted resettlement.

Found 

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
0
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Bækkevold K. M. et al. Navigating “Promising Victimhood:” Discretionary Practices of UNHCR Caseworkers in Rwanda’s Refugee Resettlement Process // Journal on Migration and Human Security. 2024.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Bækkevold K. M., Bjørkhaug I., Irankunda J., Divon S. A. Navigating “Promising Victimhood:” Discretionary Practices of UNHCR Caseworkers in Rwanda’s Refugee Resettlement Process // Journal on Migration and Human Security. 2024.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1177/23315024241300318
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23315024241300318
TI - Navigating “Promising Victimhood:” Discretionary Practices of UNHCR Caseworkers in Rwanda’s Refugee Resettlement Process
T2 - Journal on Migration and Human Security
AU - Bækkevold, Kine Marie
AU - Bjørkhaug, Ingunn
AU - Irankunda, Jerome
AU - Divon, Shai André
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/12/19
PB - SAGE
SN - 2331-5024
SN - 2330-2488
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Bækkevold,
author = {Kine Marie Bækkevold and Ingunn Bjørkhaug and Jerome Irankunda and Shai André Divon},
title = {Navigating “Promising Victimhood:” Discretionary Practices of UNHCR Caseworkers in Rwanda’s Refugee Resettlement Process},
journal = {Journal on Migration and Human Security},
year = {2024},
publisher = {SAGE},
month = {dec},
url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23315024241300318},
doi = {10.1177/23315024241300318}
}