Open Access
Open access
BMC Geriatrics, volume 25, issue 1, publication number 194

Accuracy of tongue strength, endurance, and pressure using Iowa oral performance instrument and predictors of dysphagia in community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study

Yen-Fang Chou
Chien‐Mei Sung
Yu-Hao Chu
Kai-Jo Chiang
Ruey Chen
Kondwani Joseph Banda
Chiu‐Kuei Lee
Melati Fajarini
Kuei-Ru Chou
Show full list: 9 authors
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-03-24
Journal: BMC Geriatrics
scimago Q1
SJR1.203
CiteScore5.7
Impact factor3.4
ISSN14712318
Abstract
Background

Decreased tongue strength, pressure, and endurance are key indicators in determining oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD). This study aimed to examine the accuracy of the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) in assessing tongue strength, endurance, and pressure, and to identify predictors of OD.

Methods

In this study, we analyzed data of community-dwelling older adults (age ≥ 65 years) collected between March to December 2022. The accuracy for IOPI was examined with Receiver operating characteristic curve using area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) and optimal cutoff with Youden index (J). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of OD were performed presenting odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

The cohort consisted of 85 older adults with mean age of 83.25 years (SD 6.76), of which 64 (75.3%) were female. The prevalence of OD using EAT-10 was 8.3%. Tongue strength demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy using anterior tongue strength (ATS): cut-off: 37.5 kPa (AUC: 0.79, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.65) and posterior tongue strength: cut-off: 31.5 kPa (AUC: 0.73, Se: 0.71, and Sp: 0.79). Tongue endurance demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy using anterior endurance target second (ATE-Target Sec): cut-off: 2.4 (AUC: 0.96, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.90), PTE-Target Sec: cut-off: 1.7 (AUC: 0.93, Se: 0.86, and Sp: 0.83), ATE-Target Max with cut-off: 34.4 kPa (AUC 0.81, Se = 0.86, and Sp = 0.64), and PTE-Target Max with cut-off: 29.5 kPa (AUC: 0.77, Se = 0.86, and Sp = 0.69). Tongue pressure revealed limited diagnostic accuracy using saliva swallowing pressure with cut-off: 23.3 kPa (AUC: 0.60) and effortful swallowing pressure with cut-off: 28.5 kPa (AUC: 0.62). Significant predictors for OD were frailty (3.02, 95%CI: 1.56–5.88), age (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01–1.35), nutritional status (0.72, 95%CI: 0.57–0.92), ATS (0.86, 95%CI: 0.77–0.97), ATE-Target Max (0.90, 95%CI: 0.84–0.97), PTE-Target Max (0.92, 95%CI: 0.86–0.99), ADL (0.91), IADL (0.67), and depression (1.32).

Conclusions

The findings suggest that tongue strength and endurance, measured by IOPI, are more effective parameters than tongue pressure, with frailty, age, nutritional status, ATS, ATE-Target Max, PTE-Target Max, ADL, IADL, and depression being essential for early screening of OD in community-dwelling older adults.

Clinical trial number

Not applicable.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex
Found error?