Open Access
“You can’t un-ring the bell”: a mixed methods approach to understanding veteran and family perspectives of recovery from military-related posttraumatic stress disorder
Kate St. Cyr
1
,
Jenny J.W. Liu
2
,
Heidi Cramm
3
,
Anthony Nazarov
2
,
Renee Hunt
4
,
Callista Forchuk
4
,
Erisa Deda
5
,
J Don Richardson
2
4
Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Canada
|
5
St. Joseph’s Operational Stress Injury Clinic, London, Canada
|
Publication type: Journal Article
Publication date: 2022-01-14
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR: 1.375
CiteScore: 5.8
Impact factor: 3.6
ISSN: 1471244X
PubMed ID:
35031020
Psychiatry and Mental health
Abstract
Military-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a complex diagnosis with non-linear trajectories of coping and recovery. Current approaches to the evaluation of PTSD and treatment discontinuation often rely on biomedical models that dichotomize recovery based on symptom thresholds. This approach may not sufficiently capture the complex lived experiences of Veterans and their families. To explore conceptualizations of recovery, we sought perspectives from Veterans and their partners in a pilot study to understand: 1) how Veterans nearing completion of treatment for military-related PTSD and their partners view recovery; and 2) the experience of progressing through treatment towards recovery. We employed a concurrent mixed methods design. Nine Veterans nearing the end of their treatment at a specialized outpatient mental health clinic completed quantitative self-report tools assessing PTSD and depressive symptom severity, and an individual, semi-structured interview assessing views on their treatment and recovery processes. Veterans’ partners participated in a separate interview to capture views of their partners’ treatment and recovery processes. Descriptive analyses of self-report symptom severity data were interpreted alongside emergent themes arising from inductive content analysis of qualitative interviews. While over half of Veterans were considered “recovered” based on quantitative assessments of symptoms, individual reflections of “recovery” were not always aligned with these quantitative assessments. A persistent narrative highlighted by participants was that recovery from military-related PTSD was not viewed as a binary outcome (i.e., recovered vs. not recovered); rather, recovery was seen as a dynamic, non-linear process. Key components of the recovery process identified by participants included a positive therapeutic relationship, social support networks, and a toolkit of adaptive strategies to address PTSD symptoms. For participants in our study, recovery was seen as the ability to navigate ongoing issues of symptom management, re-engagement with meaningful roles and social networks, and a readiness for discontinuing intensive, specialized mental health treatment. The findings of this study highlight important considerations in balancing the practical utility of symptom severity assessments with a better understanding of the treatment discontinuation-related needs of Veterans with military-related PTSD and their families, which align with a contemporary biopsychosocial approach to recovery.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Found
Nothing found, try to update filter.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
|
|
|
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Methodological Innovations
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Cureus
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Comprehensive Psychiatry
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Injury Epidemiology
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Psychological Services
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
1
|
Publishers
|
1
2
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 22.22%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
2 publications, 22.22%
|
|
|
MDPI
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
American Psychological Association (APA)
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
Wiley
1 publication, 11.11%
|
|
|
1
2
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.
Are you a researcher?
Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
9
Total citations:
9
Citations from 2024:
7
(77.78%)
The most citing journal
Citations in journal:
1
Cite this
GOST |
RIS |
BibTex
Cite this
GOST
Copy
St. Cyr K. et al. “You can’t un-ring the bell”: a mixed methods approach to understanding veteran and family perspectives of recovery from military-related posttraumatic stress disorder // BMC Psychiatry. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 1. 37
GOST all authors (up to 50)
Copy
St. Cyr K., Liu J. J., Cramm H., Nazarov A., Hunt R., Forchuk C., Deda E., Richardson J. D. “You can’t un-ring the bell”: a mixed methods approach to understanding veteran and family perspectives of recovery from military-related posttraumatic stress disorder // BMC Psychiatry. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 1. 37
Cite this
RIS
Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1186/s12888-021-03622-3
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03622-3
TI - “You can’t un-ring the bell”: a mixed methods approach to understanding veteran and family perspectives of recovery from military-related posttraumatic stress disorder
T2 - BMC Psychiatry
AU - St. Cyr, Kate
AU - Liu, Jenny J.W.
AU - Cramm, Heidi
AU - Nazarov, Anthony
AU - Hunt, Renee
AU - Forchuk, Callista
AU - Deda, Erisa
AU - Richardson, J Don
PY - 2022
DA - 2022/01/14
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 22
PMID - 35031020
SN - 1471-244X
ER -
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors)
Copy
@article{2022_St. Cyr,
author = {Kate St. Cyr and Jenny J.W. Liu and Heidi Cramm and Anthony Nazarov and Renee Hunt and Callista Forchuk and Erisa Deda and J Don Richardson},
title = {“You can’t un-ring the bell”: a mixed methods approach to understanding veteran and family perspectives of recovery from military-related posttraumatic stress disorder},
journal = {BMC Psychiatry},
year = {2022},
volume = {22},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03622-3},
number = {1},
pages = {37},
doi = {10.1186/s12888-021-03622-3}
}