Accuracy of temporomandibular disorders diagnosis evaluated through the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorder (DC/TDM) Axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a complex joint that facilitates mandibular movements during speech, chewing, and swallowing activities. The Axis I evaluation of the DC/TMD focuses on assessing physical diagnoses related to TMDs. It includes an assessment of pain and functional limitations, such as jaw opening range, joint sounds, and joint tenderness. The Axis II evaluation of the DC/TMD provides information on the patient’s psychological status and quality of life. This Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Temporomandibular Disorders diagnosis considered through the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorder (DC/TDM) axis II compared to the Axis I evaluations.
Methods
A search was made in PubMed, Web of Science and Lilacs for articles published from the inception until 20 January 2023. We applied the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcomes (PECO) model [1] to assess document eligibility. Only studies that evaluated patients by DC/TMD Axis I and Axis II were considered. Review Manager version 5.2.8 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for the pooled analysis. We measured the odds ratio (OR) between the two groups (Axis I and Axis II).
Results
Fifty-one articles were selected because of the search. Four papers were excluded before the screening: 2 pieces were not in English, and two were reviewed. The remaining 47 articles were selected for the title and abstract screening to evaluate whether they met the PECO criteria. Among these, four papers were established; the overall effect showed that there was no difference in TMD diagnosis between Axis I and Axis II (RR 1.17; 95% CI: 0.80– 1.71; Z:0.82; P = .41), suggesting that there is no difference between Axis I and Axis II.
Conclusion
In conclusion, DC/TMD is an effective tool for the diagnosis of TMD. It improves the accuracy of TMD diagnosis, allows for the classification of subtypes, and assesses psychosocial factors that may impact the development or maintenance of TMD symptoms.
Top-30
Journals
|
1
2
|
|
|
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
2 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Medicina
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Scientific Reports
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Symmetry
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Journal of Dental Research
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Journal of Clinical Medicine
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
1
2
|
Publishers
|
1
2
3
|
|
|
MDPI
3 publications, 37.5%
|
|
|
Elsevier
2 publications, 25%
|
|
|
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
Springer Nature
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
SAGE
1 publication, 12.5%
|
|
|
1
2
3
|
- We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
- Statistics recalculated weekly.