Open Access
Open access
volume 22 issue 1 publication number 3

Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2024-01-18
scimago Q2
wos Q2
SJR0.659
CiteScore3.4
Impact factor2.5
ISSN14787547
Health Policy
Abstract
Background

Human communities suffered a vast socioeconomic burden in dealing with the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) globally. Real-word data about these burdens can inform governments about evidence-based resource allocation and prioritization. The aim of this scoping review was to map the cost-of-illness (CoI) studies associated with COVID-19.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted from January 2019 to December 2021. We searched cost-of-illness papers published in English within Web of Sciences, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Science Direct and ProQuest. For each eligible study, extracted data included country, publication year, study period, study design, epidemiological approach, costing method, cost type, cost identification, sensitivity analysis, estimated unit cost and national burden. All of the analyses were applied in Excel software.

Results

2352 records were found after the search strategy application, finally 28 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Most of the studies were done in the United States, Turkey, and China. The prevalence-based approach was the most common in the studies, and most of studies also used Hospital Information System data (HIS). There were noticeable differences in the costing methods and the cost identification. The average cost of hospitalization per patient per day ranged from 101$ in Turkey to 2,364$ in the United States. Among the studies, 82.1% estimated particularly direct medical costs, 3.6% only indirect costs, and 14.3% both direct and indirect costs.

Conclusion

The economic burden of COVID-19 varies from country to country. The majority of CoI studies estimated direct medical costs associated with COVID-19 and there is a paucity of evidence for direct non-medical, indirect, and intangible costs, which we recommend for future studies. To create homogeneity in CoI studies, we suggest researchers follow a conceptual framework and critical appraisal checklist of cost-of-illness (CoI) studies.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
Health Economics Review
3 publications, 75%
BMC Public Health
1 publication, 25%
1
2
3

Publishers

1
2
3
4
Springer Nature
4 publications, 100%
1
2
3
4
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
4
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Nakhaee M., Khandehroo M., Esmaeili R. Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review // Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 1. 3
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Nakhaee M., Khandehroo M., Esmaeili R. Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review // Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 1. 3
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1186/s12962-024-00514-7
UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00514-7
TI - Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review
T2 - Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
AU - Nakhaee, Majid
AU - Khandehroo, Masoud
AU - Esmaeili, Reza
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/01/18
PB - Springer Nature
IS - 1
VL - 22
PMID - 38238797
SN - 1478-7547
ER -
BibTex
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2024_Nakhaee,
author = {Majid Nakhaee and Masoud Khandehroo and Reza Esmaeili},
title = {Cost of illness studies in COVID-19: a scoping review},
journal = {Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation},
year = {2024},
volume = {22},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
month = {jan},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-024-00514-7},
number = {1},
pages = {3},
doi = {10.1186/s12962-024-00514-7}
}