Earthquake Spectra, volume 20, issue 3, pages 757-778

Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands

Anil K. Chopra 1
Rakesh K. Goel 2
CHATPAN CHINTANAPAKDEE 3
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2004-08-01
scimago Q1
SJR1.248
CiteScore8.4
Impact factor3.1
ISSN87552930, 19448201
Geophysics
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Abstract

The modal pushover analysis (MPA) procedure, which includes the contributions of all significant modes of vibration, estimates seismic demands much more accurately than current pushover procedures used in structural engineering practice. Outlined in this paper is a modified MPA (MMPA) procedure wherein the response contributions of higher vibration modes are computed by assuming the building to be linearly elastic, thus reducing the computational effort. After outlining such a modified procedure, its accuracy is evaluated for a variety of frame buildings and ground motion ensembles. Although it is not necessarily more accurate than the MPA procedure, the MMPA procedure is an attractive alternative for practical application because it leads to a larger estimate of seismic demands, improving the accuracy of the MPA results in some cases (relative to nonlinear response history analysis) and increasing their conservatism in others. However, such conservatism is unacceptably large for lightly damped systems, with damping significantly less than 5%. Thus the MMPA procedure is not recommended for such systems.

Found 

Top-30

Journals

5
10
15
20
25
30
5
10
15
20
25
30

Publishers

10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated only for publications connected to researchers, organizations and labs registered on the platform.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Share
Cite this
GOST | RIS | BibTex | MLA
Found error?