volume 94 issue 1120 pages 20201215

Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology

Matt. T. Cashmore 1
Aaron J McCann 2
Stephen J Wastling 3
Cormac McGrath 2
John Thornton 3
Matt G. Hall 1
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-03-12
scimago Q1
wos Q1
SJR0.875
CiteScore5.6
Impact factor3.4
ISSN00071285, 1748880X
PubMed ID:  33710907
General Medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Abstract

MRI has been an essential diagnostic tool in healthcare for several decades. It offers unique insights into most tissues without the need for ionising radiation. Historically, MRI has been predominantly used qualitatively, images are formed to allow visual discrimination of tissues types and pathologies, rather than providing quantitative measurements. Increasingly, quantitative MRI (qMRI) is also finding clinical application, where images provide the basis for physical measurements of, e.g. tissue volume measures and represent aspects of tissue composition and microstructure. This article reviews some common current research and clinical applications of qMRI from the perspective of measurement science. qMRI not only offers additional information for radiologists, but also the opportunity for improved harmonisation and calibration between scanners and as such it is well-suited to large-scale investigations such as clinical trials and longitudinal studies. Realising these benefits, however, presents a new kind of technical challenge to MRI practioners. When measuring a parameter quantitatively, it is crucial that the reliability and reproducibility of the technique are well understood. Strictly speaking, a numerical result of a measurement is meaningless unless it is accompanied by a description of the associated measurement uncertainty. It is therefore necessary to produce not just estimates of physical properties in a quantitative image, but also their associated uncertainties. As the process of determining a physical property from the raw MR signal is complicated and multistep, estimation of uncertainty is challenging and there are many aspects of the MRI process that require validation. With the clinical implementation of qMRI techniques and its continued expansion, there is a clear and urgent need for metrology in this field.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
4 publications, 8%
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine
4 publications, 8%
Physica Medica
2 publications, 4%
Medical Physics
2 publications, 4%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
2 publications, 4%
Tomography
1 publication, 2%
Journal of Pathology Informatics
1 publication, 2%
Radiography
1 publication, 2%
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
1 publication, 2%
Newborn
1 publication, 2%
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
1 publication, 2%
Machine Learning: Science and Technology
1 publication, 2%
Investigative Radiology
1 publication, 2%
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
1 publication, 2%
BMC Medical Imaging
1 publication, 2%
IEEE Sensors Letters
1 publication, 2%
Communications Engineering
1 publication, 2%
Biomedicines
1 publication, 2%
NMR in Biomedicine
1 publication, 2%
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
1 publication, 2%
Izmeritel`naya Tekhnika
1 publication, 2%
Radiology
1 publication, 2%
Measurement Techniques
1 publication, 2%
Pediatric Radiology
1 publication, 2%
F1000Research
1 publication, 2%
Information (Switzerland)
1 publication, 2%
Metrologia
1 publication, 2%
European Radiology
1 publication, 2%
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience
1 publication, 2%
1
2
3
4

Publishers

2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Springer Nature
13 publications, 26%
Wiley
9 publications, 18%
MDPI
5 publications, 10%
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
5 publications, 10%
Elsevier
3 publications, 6%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
3 publications, 6%
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
2 publications, 4%
IOP Publishing
2 publications, 4%
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
1 publication, 2%
AME Publishing Company
1 publication, 2%
FSUE VNIIMS All-Russian Research Institute of Metrological Service
1 publication, 2%
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
1 publication, 2%
F1000 Research
1 publication, 2%
IMR Press
1 publication, 2%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 2%
Edizioni Minerva Medica
1 publication, 2%
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
50
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Cashmore M. T. et al. Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology // British Journal of Radiology. 2021. Vol. 94. No. 1120. p. 20201215.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Cashmore M. T., McCann A. J., Wastling S. J., McGrath C., Thornton J., Hall M. G. Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology // British Journal of Radiology. 2021. Vol. 94. No. 1120. p. 20201215.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20201215
UR - https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201215
TI - Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology
T2 - British Journal of Radiology
AU - Cashmore, Matt. T.
AU - McCann, Aaron J
AU - Wastling, Stephen J
AU - McGrath, Cormac
AU - Thornton, John
AU - Hall, Matt G.
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/03/12
PB - British Institute of Radiology
SP - 20201215
IS - 1120
VL - 94
PMID - 33710907
SN - 0007-1285
SN - 1748-880X
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Cashmore,
author = {Matt. T. Cashmore and Aaron J McCann and Stephen J Wastling and Cormac McGrath and John Thornton and Matt G. Hall},
title = {Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology},
journal = {British Journal of Radiology},
year = {2021},
volume = {94},
publisher = {British Institute of Radiology},
month = {mar},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201215},
number = {1120},
pages = {20201215},
doi = {10.1259/bjr.20201215}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Cashmore, Matt. T., et al. “Clinical quantitative MRI and the need for metrology.” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 94, no. 1120, Mar. 2021, p. 20201215. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20201215.