Open Access
Open access
volume 15 issue 5 pages e0232697

Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2020-05-04
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Abstract
Purpose Although dose prediction for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been accomplished by a deep learning approach, delineation of some structures is needed for the prediction. We sought to develop a fully automated dose-generation framework for IMRT of prostate cancer by entering the patient CT datasets without the contour information into a generative adversarial network (GAN) and to compare its prediction performance to a conventional prediction model trained from patient contours. Methods We propose a synthetic approach to translate patient CT datasets into a dose distribution for IMRT. The framework requires only paired-images, i.e., patient CT images and corresponding RT-doses. The model was trained from 81 IMRT plans of prostate cancer patients, and then produced the dose distribution for 9 test cases. To compare its prediction performance to that of another trained model, we created a model trained from structure images. Dosimetric parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were calculated from the generated and original dose distributions, and mean differences of dosimetric parameters were compared between the CT-based model and the structure-based model. Results The mean differences of all dosimetric parameters except for D98% and D95% for PTV were within approximately 2% and 3% of the prescription dose for OARs in the CT-based model, while the differences in the structure-based model were within approximately 1% for PTV and approximately 2% for OARs, with a mean prediction time of 5 seconds per patient. Conclusions Accurate and rapid dose prediction was achieved by the learning of patient CT datasets by a GAN-based framework. The CT-based dose prediction could reduce the time required for both the iterative optimization process and the structure contouring, allowing physicians and dosimetrists to focus their expertise on more challenging cases.
Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
3
4
5
6
Medical Physics
6 publications, 9.84%
Physics in Medicine and Biology
4 publications, 6.56%
Physica Medica
4 publications, 6.56%
Frontiers in Oncology
3 publications, 4.92%
Medical Image Analysis
3 publications, 4.92%
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
3 publications, 4.92%
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
3 publications, 4.92%
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
2 publications, 3.28%
Knowledge-Based Systems
2 publications, 3.28%
Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique
2 publications, 3.28%
Radiotherapy and Oncology
2 publications, 3.28%
Future Science OA
1 publication, 1.64%
Life
1 publication, 1.64%
Diagnostics
1 publication, 1.64%
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
1 publication, 1.64%
Seminars in Radiation Oncology
1 publication, 1.64%
Computers in Biology and Medicine
1 publication, 1.64%
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
1 publication, 1.64%
Artificial Intelligence in Data and Big Data Processing
1 publication, 1.64%
International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology
1 publication, 1.64%
International Journal of Neural Systems
1 publication, 1.64%
Analytics
1 publication, 1.64%
Clinical Oncology
1 publication, 1.64%
PLOS Digital Health
1 publication, 1.64%
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
1 publication, 1.64%
Meta-Radiology
1 publication, 1.64%
Journal of Personalized Medicine
1 publication, 1.64%
Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
1 publication, 1.64%
IEEE Access
1 publication, 1.64%
1
2
3
4
5
6

Publishers

5
10
15
20
25
Elsevier
25 publications, 40.98%
Wiley
11 publications, 18.03%
Springer Nature
5 publications, 8.2%
MDPI
4 publications, 6.56%
IOP Publishing
4 publications, 6.56%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
4 publications, 6.56%
Frontiers Media S.A.
3 publications, 4.92%
Taylor & Francis
1 publication, 1.64%
World Scientific
1 publication, 1.64%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 1.64%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 1.64%
5
10
15
20
25
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
61
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Murakami Yu. et al. Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 5. p. e0232697.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Murakami Yu., Magome T., Matsumoto K., SATO T., Yoshioka Y., Oguchi M. Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients // PLoS ONE. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 5. p. e0232697.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0232697
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232697
TI - Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Murakami, Yu
AU - Magome, Taiki
AU - Matsumoto, Kazuki
AU - SATO, TOMOHARU
AU - Yoshioka, Yasuo
AU - Oguchi, Masahiko
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/05/04
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0232697
IS - 5
VL - 15
PMID - 32365088
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2020_Murakami,
author = {Yu Murakami and Taiki Magome and Kazuki Matsumoto and TOMOHARU SATO and Yasuo Yoshioka and Masahiko Oguchi},
title = {Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2020},
volume = {15},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {may},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232697},
number = {5},
pages = {e0232697},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0232697}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Murakami, Yu., et al. “Fully automated dose prediction using generative adversarial networks in prostate cancer patients.” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 5, May. 2020, p. e0232697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232697.