Open Access
Open access
volume 16 issue 4 pages e0250425

“Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations

Sofi Fristedt 1
Samantha Svärdh 2
Charlotte Löfqvist 3
Steven M. Schmidt 3
Susanne Iwarsson 3
Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2021-04-22
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Multidisciplinary
Abstract

While a broad spectrum of technologies is integrated in everyday life and routines, most research on ageing, health and technology has focused on attitudes toward and adoption of digital technologies including e-health, or home based monitoring systems. The aim of this study was to explore differences and similarities in attitudes and experiences with different types of technologies and development within and between three generations. We applied a qualitative, descriptive design and recruited a purposeful sample of participants from three generations (30–39, 50–59, 70–79 year old). The 25 participants took part in 3 x 2 focus groups. Forming four categories, the findings show that technologies enable as well as complicate everyday life. Participants expressed trust as well as uncertainty about risks when using technology and stated that use of digital services is required while support is limited. They identified that technology development is inevitable but not always in the service of users. In conclusion, experiences of and attitudes towards technologies and technology development are not limited to generation; perspectives sometimes unite individuals across rather than within generations. Thus future technologies and technology development, as well as services and policies aiming to support the use of said technologies should consider individual user perspectives including needs, desires, beliefs or goals neglected in the existing technology models, and involve users beyond generations defined by chronological age. Such strategies are likely to be more successful in supporting development of technologies usable for all.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
2
JMIR Aging
2 publications, 8.7%
Frontiers in Psychology
1 publication, 4.35%
Computers
1 publication, 4.35%
Nature Aging
1 publication, 4.35%
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care
1 publication, 4.35%
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
1 publication, 4.35%
BMC Nursing
1 publication, 4.35%
Activities, Adaptation and Aging
1 publication, 4.35%
Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences
1 publication, 4.35%
Journal of Global Information Management
1 publication, 4.35%
Educational Gerontology
1 publication, 4.35%
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
1 publication, 4.35%
Fisheries
1 publication, 4.35%
PLoS ONE
1 publication, 4.35%
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
1 publication, 4.35%
Nordic Social Work Research
1 publication, 4.35%
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
1 publication, 4.35%
Public Transport
1 publication, 4.35%
BMC Digital Health
1 publication, 4.35%
Information Communication and Society
1 publication, 4.35%
1
2

Publishers

1
2
3
4
5
Taylor & Francis
5 publications, 21.74%
Springer Nature
4 publications, 17.39%
Emerald
3 publications, 13.04%
JMIR Publications
2 publications, 8.7%
Frontiers Media S.A.
1 publication, 4.35%
MDPI
1 publication, 4.35%
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
1 publication, 4.35%
Medknow
1 publication, 4.35%
SAGE
1 publication, 4.35%
Research Square Platform LLC
1 publication, 4.35%
IGI Global
1 publication, 4.35%
Oxford University Press
1 publication, 4.35%
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
1 publication, 4.35%
1
2
3
4
5
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
23
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Fristedt S. et al. “Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations // PLoS ONE. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. p. e0250425.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Fristedt S., Svärdh S., Löfqvist C., Schmidt S. M., Iwarsson S. “Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations // PLoS ONE. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 4. p. e0250425.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0250425
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250425
TI - “Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Fristedt, Sofi
AU - Svärdh, Samantha
AU - Löfqvist, Charlotte
AU - Schmidt, Steven M.
AU - Iwarsson, Susanne
PY - 2021
DA - 2021/04/22
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0250425
IS - 4
VL - 16
PMID - 33886658
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2021_Fristedt,
author = {Sofi Fristedt and Samantha Svärdh and Charlotte Löfqvist and Steven M. Schmidt and Susanne Iwarsson},
title = {“Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2021},
volume = {16},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {apr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250425},
number = {4},
pages = {e0250425},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0250425}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Fristedt, Sofi, et al. ““Am I representative (of my age)? No, I’m not”—Attitudes to technologies and technology development differ but unite individuals across rather than within generations.” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 4, Apr. 2021, p. e0250425. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250425.