Open Access
Open access
volume 20 issue 2 pages e0314982

Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy

Publication typeJournal Article
Publication date2025-02-06
scimago Q1
wos Q2
SJR0.803
CiteScore5.4
Impact factor2.6
ISSN19326203
Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) have been associated with changes in gene expression, which may contribute to alterations in phenotypes and disease development. However, the precise identification and characterization of SVs remain challenging. While long-read sequencing offers superior accuracy for SV detection, short-read sequencing remains essential due to practical and cost considerations, as well as the need to analyze existing short-read datasets. Numerous algorithms for short-read SV detection exist, but none are universally optimal, each having limitations for specific SV sizes and types. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of six advanced SV detection algorithms, including the commercial software DRAGEN, using the GIAB v0.6 Tier 1 benchmark and HGSVC2 cell lines. We employed both individual and combination strategies, with systematic assessments of recall, precision, and F1 scores. Our results demonstrate that the union combination approach enhanced detection capabilities, surpassing single algorithms in identifying deletions and insertions, and delivered comparable recall and F1 scores to the commercial software DRAGEN. Interestingly, expanding the number of algorithms from three to five in the combination did not enhance performance, highlighting the efficiency of a well-chosen ensemble over a larger algorithmic pool.

Found 
Found 

Top-30

Journals

1
Heredity
1 publication, 50%
Journal of Medical Genetics
1 publication, 50%
1

Publishers

1
Springer Nature
1 publication, 50%
BMJ
1 publication, 50%
1
  • We do not take into account publications without a DOI.
  • Statistics recalculated weekly.

Are you a researcher?

Create a profile to get free access to personal recommendations for colleagues and new articles.
Metrics
2
Share
Cite this
GOST |
Cite this
GOST Copy
Duan D. et al. Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy // PLoS ONE. 2025. Vol. 20. No. 2. p. e0314982.
GOST all authors (up to 50) Copy
Duan D., Cheng C., Huang Y., Chung A., Chen P., Chen Y., Hsu J. S., Chen P. Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy // PLoS ONE. 2025. Vol. 20. No. 2. p. e0314982.
RIS |
Cite this
RIS Copy
TY - JOUR
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0314982
UR - https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314982
TI - Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy
T2 - PLoS ONE
AU - Duan, De-Min
AU - Cheng, Chin-Yi
AU - Huang, Yu-Shu
AU - Chung, An-Ko
AU - Chen, Pin-Xuan
AU - Chen, Yu-An
AU - Hsu, Jacob Shujui
AU - Chen, Pei-Lung
PY - 2025
DA - 2025/02/06
PB - Public Library of Science (PLoS)
SP - e0314982
IS - 2
VL - 20
SN - 1932-6203
ER -
BibTex |
Cite this
BibTex (up to 50 authors) Copy
@article{2025_Duan,
author = {De-Min Duan and Chin-Yi Cheng and Yu-Shu Huang and An-Ko Chung and Pin-Xuan Chen and Yu-An Chen and Jacob Shujui Hsu and Pei-Lung Chen},
title = {Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
year = {2025},
volume = {20},
publisher = {Public Library of Science (PLoS)},
month = {feb},
url = {https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314982},
number = {2},
pages = {e0314982},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0314982}
}
MLA
Cite this
MLA Copy
Duan, De-Min, et al. “Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy.” PLoS ONE, vol. 20, no. 2, Feb. 2025, p. e0314982. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314982.